Sunday, May 24, 2020

coronavirus conspiracy theories

coronavirus conspiracy theories may hamper vaccine efforts

See the source image
Op Ed: I like the fact that Trumpers will not get vaccinated and I also thrilled that they are ignoring social distancing and defying lock down an stay at home orders. More than that I am ecstatic to see that they are going  their churches in droves unmasked. I am glad and very very proud to know without a doubt
that they are refusing to wear masks as they assert their God given  rights to free speech and freedom of religion and freedom of assembly as they wear the MAGA hats an carry Trump signs. 

Shout Glory as God bows to Trump!

I salute you godly Republicans!
See the source image


New poll shows coronavirus conspiracy theories may hamper vaccine efforts


According to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, 44 percent of Republicans believe that Bill Gates is plotting to use a mass COVID-19 vaccination campaign as a pretext to implant microchips in billions of people and monitor their movements — a widely debunked conspiracy theory with no basis in fact.
The survey, which was conducted May 20 and 21, found that only 26 percent of Republicans correctly identify the story as false.
In contrast, just 19 percent of Democrats believe the same spurious narrative about the Microsoft founder and public-health philanthropist. A majority of Democrats recognize that it’s not true.
As states relax their lockdown restrictions and responsibility for containing the coronavirus shifts, in part, to the American people, the vast gap between the right and the left over Gates reflects a growing problem: the dangerous, destabilizing tendency to ignore fundamental facts about the deadly pathogen in favor of misinformation peddled by partisans, including President Trump, and spread on social media. 
That tendency is more widespread on the right, although liberals also believe some false narratives (including that COVID-19 deaths have already surged in states that were quick to reopen).
The new Yahoo News/YouGov poll found that this “choose your own reality” effect is distorting perceptions of nearly every aspect of the pandemic, from reopening to vaccination to the official death toll. A broad majority of the public is either “very” (56 percent) or “somewhat” concerned (30 percent) about “false or misleading information being communicated about coronavirus.” That sentiment, at least, is not partisan: More than 80 percent of Democrats, Republicans and independents agree.
Yet blame for these concerns varies greatly by political affiliation. When Democrats are asked to select the top source of false or misleading information about the coronavirus, 56 percent pick the Trump administration; that number rises to 69 percent among Hillary Clinton voters. Republicans, however, point to the mainstream media (54 percent) as the primary culprit; 61 percent of Trump voters say likewise.
The result, in many cases, is two different sets of “facts” — only one of which resembles the truth.   
Take the Gates example. Half of all Americans (50 percent) who name Fox News as their primary television news source believe the disproven conspiracy theory, and 44 percent of voters who cast ballots for Trump in 2016 do as well — even though neither Fox nor Trump has promoted it. At the same time, just 15 percent of MSNBC viewers and 12 percent of Clinton voters say the story is true.
The spread of such an outlandish charge may seem silly, but it could have catastrophic consequences. Through his namesake foundation, the tech billionaire has long championed vaccines in developing countries. So far, he has committed $300 million to combating the coronavirus. If large portions of the public believe that Gates’s intent is nefarious — and if they go on to convince themselves that any coronavirus vaccine will be dangerous — then many may refuse to get vaccinated. (There is a parallel sentiment among some evangelicals to resist vaccination out of fear it would constitute the “mark of the beast” mentioned in the Book of Revelation.)
The more people refuse to get vaccinated, the harder it becomes to end the pandemic.
The new Yahoo News/YouGov survey shows that skepticism about a possible coronavirus vaccine is already taking root on the right. There is little partisan disagreement over vaccines in general: 83 percent of Americans consider childhood vaccines either “somewhat” or “very” safe, and more than 80 percent of Democrats, independents and Republicans share this view. The same goes for concerns over the safety of “fast-tracking” the vaccine through the typical research and regulatory process: 73 percent of Americans are at least somewhat concerned, with little difference by party affiliation.
But when it comes to actually getting vaccinated, Clinton voters are nearly 30 points more likely to say they will (72 percent) than Trump voters (44 percent). A majority of Trump voters say either that they plan to skip the shot (29 percent) or that they aren’t sure (27 percent), even though the president himself has been pushing hard for a vaccine. 
As a result, only half of Americans (50 percent) now say they intend to get vaccinated “if and when a coronavirus vaccine becomes available,” with nearly a quarter (23 percent) saying they won’t — a 5-point decline in the percentage of “yes” responses and a 4-point gain in the percentage of “no” responses since the previous Yahoo News/YouGov survey two weeks ago. The rest (27 percent) say they’re not sure.
This emerging trend against coronavirus inoculation may be linked to the smokescreen of misinformation that anti-vaccination activists and others have spread online as researchers have started to make progress on a possible vaccine. Whatever the cause, just 42 percent of Americans now trust the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health authorities to judge the risks of vaccines; 31 percent do not and 27 percent are unsure. A majority of Democrats trust the CDC; a plurality of Republicans (41 percent) do not.
Vaccines are not the only subject of misinformation. Another example with dire implications is hydroxychloroquine. A majority of Fox News viewers (53 percent), along with nearly half of Trump voters (49 percent) and Republicans (44 percent), think the antimalarial drug is an effective treatment against COVID-19 — even though study after study has not proved that to be true. In fact, a new study of 96,000 hospitalized coronavirus patients on six continents found that those who received the drug had a significantly higher risk of death compared with those who did not.
Far fewer Trump voters, meanwhile, say that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective (just 17 percent) or that they are not sure (34 percent) — an upside-down perspective that may have something to do with the fact that the president told reporters Monday that he has been taking the drug for the last “couple of weeks” as a preventive measure.
In contrast, only 5 percent of Clinton voters say hydroxychloroquine is effective. Seventy-three percent of Clinton voters say it is not.
The poll also found that a plurality of Trump voters (41 percent) say they would take hydroxychloroquine if it were available to them. Only 4 percent of Clinton voters say the same; 80 percent say they would not take the drug. The Food and Drug Administration has warned that hydroxychloroquine should be used only in clinical trials or hospitals because it can trigger fatal heart arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients.
The left is not immune to picking and choosing its preferred version of events. Democrats (58 percent) are more likely than Republicans (33 percent) to believe that “coronavirus-related deaths have surged” in early-to-reopen red states such as “Florida, Georgia and Texas” — as are Americans in general (45 percent). Yet average daily deaths have declined in Georgia and Florida since reopening, while holding roughly steady in Texas.
That said, the right is more inclined than the left to believe easily invalidated coronavirus claims — especially if Trump himself has made them.
Majorities of Trump voters (53 percent) and Fox News viewers (60 percent) agree, for instance, that the U.S. has conducted more coronavirus tests than the rest of the world combined, a frequent Trump boast. In reality, the U.S. has conducted fewer tests than the next three countries (Russia, Germany and Italy) put together, and fewer per capita than 38 foreign countries.
Trump’s claims that he “always viewed [the coronavirus] as very serious” and that “nobody ever thought a thing like this could happen” elicit similarly divergent responses, even when not attributed to Trump. 
Asked whether the president always viewed the coronavirus as a very serious threat, a majority of Trump voters and Republicans (51 percent in both cases) say yes; just 3 percent of Clinton voters and 8 percent of Democrats concur. In reality, Trump downplayed the threat at least 44 times
Asked whether “this kind of pandemic” was “something nobody thought could happen,” a similar number of Trump voters (51 percent) and Republicans (52 percent) answer affirmatively. Only about a third of Democrats (36 percent) and Clinton voters (30 percent) say the same — which squares with the fact that the U.S. intelligence community, public health experts, officials in Trump’s own administration and Gates himself had warned for years that the country was at risk from a pandemic like this.
Majorities of Trump voters (58 percent), Republicans (57 percent) and Fox News viewers (65 percent) also believe that “Chinese scientists engineered coronavirus in a lab, from which it accidentally escaped” — an improbable theory disputed by the intelligence community and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert. Pluralities of each of these three conservative-leaning groups also believe that “COVID-19 was intentionally created by Chinese scientists as a biowarfare weapon,” which not even the Trump administration is alleging.
And while most Americans believe that the CDC’s official coronavirus death count, which now stands at about 94,000, is either accurate (19 percent) or lower than the real number of COVID-19 deaths (45 percent), the right does not: 52 percent of Trump voters and 55 percent of Fox News viewers insist it is too high. Trump often says the same — even though many public health experts, including some within his administration, have been stressing that COVID-19 deaths and cases are almost certainly being undercounted.
A belief that deaths are being overcounted squares with assertions by Donald Trump Jr. and others in the Trump camp that Democrats are exaggerating the threat to hurt the president’s reelection. 
There is still some shared reality. Most Democrats, Republicans and independents say, for instance, that they will continue to practice social distancing even after official restrictions are lifted; most also characterize the CDC’s recommendation that everyone wear a cloth mask or other face covering in public places where distancing is not possible as “about right” in terms of strictness.
But views on reopening are starting to diverge as well. Asked in previous Yahoo News/YouGov polls whether stay-at-home orders were the only way to stop the spread of COVID-19 or whether “the cure is worse than the disease,” majorities of Americans, both Democratic and Republican, said the former. Now for the first time, a majority of Republicans (53 percent) say the cure is worse. Among Trump voters and Fox News viewers, that number skyrockets to 59 percent and 66 percent, respectively.
On the right, nearly every question about reopening is trending in the same direction. Pluralities of Republicans (44 percent) and majorities of Trump voters (55 percent) and Fox News viewers (61 percent) now support the protesters demanding an end to lockdown measures. Wide majorities of these right-leaning groups also say they are more concerned about lifting restrictions too slowly than too quickly; most Americans — by a 61 percent to 39 percent margin — still say the opposite. And while 62 percent of Americans say they’re more worried about the impact of the coronavirus on people’s health than on the economy, the right disagrees: 63 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of Trump voters and 73 percent of Fox News viewers say they’re more worried about the economy.
Similar percentages of these three groups say the economy should reopen “as soon as possible to prevent further economic damage” instead of “when public health officials are fully able to test and trace new cases and outbreaks.” Asked what’s worse — 200,000 more elderly Americans dying of COVID-19 over the next year or 30 million Americans being unemployed for the next year — 73 percent of Trump voters say the latter. Overall, Americans disagree by a 55 percent to 45 percent margin.   
These disputes are more matters of opinion than fact. But they could create challenges going forward. Fewer Americans say the U.S. is prepared (32 percent) to handle a second coronavirus outbreak if it occurs later this year than say the country is not prepared (43 percent), with 25 percent unsure. Yet Republicans are more optimistic, with 57 percent saying America is ready. 
So while a majority of Americans want the government to continue enforcing social distancing measures (63 percent) and would favor resuming lockdowns in the event of a resurgence (66 percent), Republicans are divided on these questions, with only 49 percent backing more lockdowns if infections spike and a full 59 percent agreeing that “people are practicing enough social distancing to keep coronavirus under control without strict government measures.” 
If and when the coronavirus comes back — Fauci, for one, has said a second wave is “inevitable” — it could prove difficult to reach a broad consensus on the proper response.
_____
The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,640 U.S. adult residents interviewed online between May 20 and 21, 2020. This sample was weighted according to gender, age, race and education, as well as 2016 presidential vote, registration status and news interest. Respondents were selected from YouGov’s opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S residents. The margin of error is approximately 3.0 percent.

COVID-19 Updates

COVID-19 Updates

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Call Trump Supporters What They Are And Let Their Lies Kill Them: A Reader's Op Ed


NY got slammed by COVID 19 because in December Trump failed to warn the US about this. New Yorkers we blindsided as a result. Today, because NY and the Northeast has responsible and intelligent citizens when compared to Red states and that is why it so quickly flattened the curve. By every measure of morality the Bible belt is the most thoroughly depraved part of the country. This could be in part due to their religiosity which tells them they are saved from fiery damnation as opposed to Catholics who confess their sins and Jews who put their money where the mouths are and make atonement for their misdeeds.

See the source image

Is it moral to waste your breath on people who don't want to know the truth and are so selfish and depraved that they would put others at risk to pursue their sluttish hedonistic pleasures, disrespect the rights of others and support a treasonous lying sexually perverted narcissist? I don't think so. While it is the instinct of decent moral people e.g. the 911 fire fighters to save people, is it moral or prudent to spend effort on people who vile and don't want to be saved from their own vulgar depravity? I say it isn't. Robespierre said, "To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency, to forgive them is barbarity." 

There is not good in everyone! Some people are simply NO DAMN GOOD!

As I have grown older and see how evil some humans are I have come to believe that our responsibility to humanity is to give our efforts to those who are most deserving. Should we waste effort on the drunkard and the glutton given the fact that the cure rate for them is 5% as we neglect, the disabled and the wounded?

Do the wages of sin really lead to death?  
The lower live expectancy in the Bible Belt seems to indicate that. My hope is that the greedy, selfish, exploitative, dishonest get what's coming to them in spaded. I think they have been warned and scolded enough and I think it is time that they reap the rewards of their treachery dishonesty and depravity and I think it is time that we stop trying protect them from themselves and let the consequences of  their, hypocrisy and depraved and willful ignorance lead them to an early grave.

I was abused as a child and raped by a doctor who got away with it. I had my skull fractured by an abusive mother. I suffered cognitive deficits and learning disorders as a result. I would resent druggies and drunks who got rehab mollycoddling for a problem that really was of their own doing..assholes! followed by a kiss on the forehead for simply doing the right thing and not drinking and drugging for a while. With a 5% success rate it hardly seems fair or moral to spend resources on people who simply are no damn good due to their moral failings. I never got an even break, not even close. I see the gluttons getting their free insulin, CPAP machines, medications while the US has the highest infant mortality rate in the industrialized world.

Many people are not worth the effort.

The do-gooders spend their energies on human trash waste cases whether it be a vain attempt at trying to reach them or simply enabling them to be the squealing pigs that they are while some happy clown tells the truly wounded downtrodden such as the veteran who got his brains scrambled,  or legs blown  for or the sexual abuse and the rape victim that they are survivors when they are anything but survivors.

Again, is it moral to aid evil people who are the enemies of humanity in their survival?  Would it not be more moral to allow their own selfish depravity of Trump supporters be their demise? Trump supporters are not the fools most people think they are. They know what they and they are not what you think they are. They are depraved and they know it. They and their depravity was around long before Trump. Trump has just made it fashionable. Maybe the moral thing to do is aid them in their self-destruction? The moral people will take initiative, precautions and do the right thing and the immoral ones won't. Why even try to enlighten them? Had Trump, his people and disciples been around in 1789 France they would be subject to a reign of terror but today they are the ones orchestrating the terror with their displays of weapons of war and mass shootings.

The mental health industry charlatans would have us believe that behavior is largely a product of nurture. Neuroscience has debunked that. The sociopath, the pedophile, the narcissist are all a products of biology and genes. Unlike the lovable and useful dog who was derived from wolf through generations of culling and breeding, many modern humans evolved to be Machiavellian, selfish, greedy and ruthless predators. Left to their own devices COVID-19 could be the tool needed to purge the gene pool of their depravity much like Nuremberg purged a lot of Nazi DNA from the gene pool  and thus improved Germany.

News today has become propaganda now that we are in the post truth era. Useful content has been replaced with narratives, spin and agendas. I think its time for the responsible media to say, "Donald Trump is a piece of shit and so are his supporters and the less of people like them on the planet the better chance for humanity's survival".


Florida scientist was fired for refusing to manipulate COVID-19 data


Op Ed: Florida and Republican corruption go hand in hand. Yeah I get it, using the words Florida, Republican and corruption are triple redundant. Florida is a toilet and so is any state that elects Republicans. Mind you, Republicans politicians were not always the epitome of slime and corruption and the reason nearly all Republican elected officials are corrupt today is because the depraved Republican base would not elect or support any Republican who wasn't corrupt, so Florida.... FUCK YOU! 


To the non Democrats and other non Republicans who are complacent and whine, fuck you too. If you not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. Unless and until you have the courage to rid your state of these Republican scumbags by whatever means possible you are part of the problem.

That's right, FUCK YOU Florida and your election fraud, your crime rate, your hate groups, your drug culture, and your hurricanes. You assholes elected criminal Rick Scott as your governor twice and now as your senator. If your election system is so badly rigged as most people then you need to apply a 2nd amendment solution to cure your state of Republicanism but for now encourage the mouthy lowlife MAGAts in your shit hole state to believe Tump's lie that COVID-19 is a hoax and abandon social distancing and all other prudent measures to stop the spread COVID-19 an protect yourselves in your doomed shit hole of a state.

By 2050 large coastal sections of Florida will be under water. Add a few category 4 and 5 hurricanes to the mix it could happen sooner. Hurry up and die Florida, America is depending on it.  

Death Deserving Florida Officials Fire Scientist Rebekah Jones For Not Lying


Florida's scientist was fired for refusing to 'manipulate' COVID-19 data
Florida Scientist Rebekah Jones Fired For Not Lying

BREVARD COUNTY, Fla. – The scientist who created Florida's COVID-19 data portal wasn't just removed from her position on May 5, she was fired on Monday by the Department of Health, she said, for refusing to manipulate data.
Rebekah Jones said in an email to the USA TODAY Network that she single-handedly created two applications in two languages, four dashboards, six unique maps with layers of data functionality for 32 variables covering a half a million lines of data. Her objective was to create a way for Floridians and researchers to see what the COVID-19 situation was in real time.
Then, she was dismissed. 
"I worked on it alone, sixteen hours a day for two months, most of which I was never paid for, and now that this has happened I'll probably never get paid for," she wrote in an email, confirming that she had not just been reassigned on May 5, but fired from her job as Geographic Information Systems manager for the Florida Department of Health. 

After USA TODAY Network first reported Jones' removal from her position in charge of the Florida COVID-19 Data and Surveillance Dashboard she created, she confirmed, as reported by CBS-12 in West Palm Beach that she was fired because she was ordered to censor some data, but refused to "manually change data to drum up support for the plan to reopen."

She provided no further details. 
In an email last Friday to researchers and other data users, Jones warned that with her removal changes were likely coming to the accessibility and transparency of the dashboard data. 
"They are making a lot of changes. I would advise being diligent in your respective uses of this data," she wrote. 

Related Video: Restaurants and Bars Draw Crowds After Reopening 


Scroll back up to restore default view.
Researchers who saw the email reacted with shock and dismay, suggesting it could be evidence that the Gov. Ron De Santis' government was censoring information to support the case for re-opening Florida.
Lucky Tran, a Biologist and public health communicator at Columbia University, on Twitter reacted to the news in a series of tweets: "When politicians censor scientists and manipulate the numbers, the rest of us suffer," he wrote.
US Congresswoman representing Tampa Bay, Kathy Castor wrote: "Floridians will not feel safe in opening up without transparency."
Governor Ron DeSantis' spokeswoman, Helen Aguirre Ferré, issued a statement to the Miami Herald, saying: “The Florida COVID-19 Dashboard was created by the Geographic Information System (GIS) team in the Division of Disease Control and Health Protection at the Florida Department of Health. Although Rebekah Jones is no longer involved, the GIS team continues to manage and update the Dashboard providing accurate and important information that is publicly accessible.”
But emails from Jones through April showed that Jones was the one responding to feedback from researchers in a bid to improve and update her product. Jones told the USA TODAY Network that she alone was responsible for "every line of code." 
In a May 5 email in which she announced the launch of a Spanish-language version of the dashboard, Jones wrote: "Please be patient as we get all this connected and running smoothly, and do let me know if you see any errors." It was sent the same day she was removed from her role managing of the dashboard.

For 60-days Jones said she never took a day off, not even when a powerful April 12 Easter tornado leveled her parents' home in Southeast Mississippi. A GoFundMe page was set up to help her family recover. Luckily, her mother survived. Her father, a truck driver, was in Texas at the time. 
"Sorry if I’ve been a little slow to respond these last few days," she wrote to data users in an email just 3 days later reporting updates to how data was organized, and the inclusion of county-level race data. 
Jones provided detailed updates in emails every few days, often technical and always responsive to user feedback. At the time was dismissed, she was working on making historical data more accessible to users. 
On April 25, Jones provided an explanation to why the data set would go from morning and evening daily updates to just once per day. 
"We’re gearing up to provide more analytics and data, and would not be able to process the full dataset twice daily with the staff we have," she wrote. 
"We have been directed to start tracking data related to reopening, and it is consuming a lot of staff hours on very short notice."
Days later she would be removed from the position entirely and her data users sounded the alarm that government might be censoring science. 
Jones had worked with the Department of Health as a geospatial analyst and then a Geographic Information System (GIS) manager since obtaining her doctorate in Geography from Florida State University in 2018.
She holds a masters of science degree in geography and mass communication from Louisiana State University and a bachelors in Journalism and Geography from Syracuse University. 
The Department of Health has so far not replied to request for comment.
Follow Alessandro Marazzi Sassoon on Twitter: @alemzs
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Florida scientist fired for refusing to 'manipulate' COVID-19 data
To express your outrage Contact Florida Health in Tallahassee at 850-245-4444 

COVID-19 Call Center available 24/7 | +1 (866) 779-6121 or email COVID-19@flhealth.gov

More Florida assholes to call:

State Surgeon General

Scott Rivkees, M.D.

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A00
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-0245-4210

Chief of Staff

Courtney Coppola

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A00
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-617-1560

Deputy Secretary for Health

Dr. Shamarial Roberson

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A00
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-901-6655

Deputy Secretary for Operations

Michele Tallent

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A07
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-245-4259

Deputy Secretary for County Health Systems

TBA

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A00
Tallahassee, FL 32399
.

Deputy Secretary for Children’s Medical Services

TBA

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A07
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-245-4213

General Counsel

Louise St. Laurent

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A02
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-617-1421

Inspector General

Michael Bennett

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Mail Bin A03
Tallahassee, FL 32399
850-245-4142