Friday, September 14, 2018

Trump And His Supporters Really Are Snowflakes



Like Trump, his supporters are whiny little bitches. They lie and whine and when the are not lying and whining they are whining and lying. When they are not lying and whining, they are pissing and moaning.

The filth on the right love using the pejorative terms such as libtard, snowflake and SJW. None of those pejoratives are not even close to being true. What is true is that righties are stupid and immoral and that is why they love Trump so much and why moral people hate them.

Donald Trump is a piece of shit and so are his deplorable supporters.

Trump Is A Baby Man

f624ef891b6d30ff23186afb66f90ae3c4934fc810c4e3bba37e91a2a677a2f7.jpg (378×491)



If you Trump supporters are unable to see this you are as dishonest and delusional as you are deplorable. The rest of us know all too well what you Trump supporters are. Deep down you know exactly what you filthy dirty shit bums are and so do most decent Americans.

Like Trump, his MAGAts are baby men and slutty fat women. His supporters are very much like him... EVIL!!

Watch your back traitors! Don't show your pig faces! Move to Russia and suck Putin's dick.


Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Stop Voting For Republicans

Never Again


Maga? - Demotivational Poster
Never Again! - Demotivational Poster

We know that most Trump supporters are stupid but it was more than stupidity that got him elected. The same goes for Hitler. Luckily for the good people of Germany a lot of fervent Hitler supporters were killed by the allies. Unfortunately, after the Civil War, President Lincoln didn't order a purge of the Southern aristocracy and the other traitors they financed.

Two types of people vote Republican, the evil and the stupid. Sadly, in this "democracy"  that is the case. Robespierre would have terrorized the filthy rich, the profoundly stupid and the profoundly evil.

Do what you can to dissuade idiots from voting for Republicans. Leave the profoundly evil to Antifa. In the meantime, stop voting for Republicans.

Monday, September 3, 2018

Trump Debunked Again

Why Trump and His Trash Need to Go

Maga? - Demotivational Poster




America stopped being great when treason assholes went out and voted for Trump. As bad as Trump is, his supporters are worse. Never forget that fact. Trump supporters are no different than Hitler supporters except that they are dumber and even more depraved.

Saturday, September 1, 2018

Delaware v. Prouse 440 U.S. 648 (1979)

See the source image


Driving while Black is a huge problem in the US but it is not the only problem that faces motorists of all colors. Cops aka road pirates are setting up road block under the guise of looking for unlicensed drivers but in fact they are looking for drugs, weapons and other contraband. Cops need probably cause to stop or detain a motor and its passengers.  It's a violation of the 4th amendment because this sort of detainment is illegal an in constitutes an illegal seizure.   It is also a violation of the 14th amendment

Beyond all of the above, it is a waste or law enforcement resources because the job of the police is to catch bad guys. In addition to that, there not reason to subject the public to this harassment because it makes them resent the police. It also puts police in danger of being struck by a car. If you protest it may ruffle the cop's feathers to the point they make extract you from your car or come up with a reason to beat, taser or shoot you. If you are Black, the odds of a rogue cop killing you increase dramatically. 

Record any such encounter and file a lawsuit. If in your judgment the cops are not punks or bullies, politely explain to them that what they are doing is unlawful.  If you are Black be very careful because the fact is, cops are a greater danger to African Americans than they are to White Americans. 


U.S. Supreme Court

Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)

Delaware v. Prouse
No. 77-1571
Argued January 17, 1979
Decided March 27, 1979
440 U.S. 648
Syllabus
A patrolman in a police cruiser stopped an automobile occupied by respondent and seized marihuana in plain view on the car floor. Respondent was subsequently indicted for illegal possession of a controlled substance. At a hearing on respondent's motion to suppress the marihuana, the patrolman testified that, prior to stopping the vehicle, he had observed neither traffic or equipment violations nor any suspicious activity, and that he made the stop only in order to check the driver's license and the car's registration. The patrolman was not acting pursuant to any standards, guidelines, or procedures pertaining to document spot checks, promulgated by either his department or the State Attorney General. The trial court granted the motion to suppress, finding the stop and detention to have been wholly capricious, and therefore violative of the Fourth Amendment. The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed.

Held:
1. This Court has jurisdiction in this case even though the Delaware Supreme Court held that the stop at issue not only violated the Federal Constitution but also was impermissible under the Delaware Constitution. That court's opinion shows that, even if the State Constitution would have provided an adequate basis for the judgment below, the court did not intend to rest its decision independently on the State Constitution, its holding instead depending upon its view of the reach of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Pp. 440 U. S. 651-653.

2. Except where there is at least articulable and reasonable suspicion that a motorist is unlicensed or that an automobile is not registered, or that either the vehicle or an occupant is otherwise subject to seizure for violation of law, stopping an automobile and detaining the driver in order to check his driver's license and the registration of the automobile are unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Pp. 440 U. S. 653-663.

(a) Stopping an automobile and detaining its occupants constitute a "seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, even though the purpose of the stop is limited and the resulting detention quite brief. The permissibility of a particular law enforcement practice is judged by balancing its intrusion on the individual's Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests. Pp. 440 U. S. 653-655.

(b) The State's interest in discretionary spot checks as a means of ensuring the safety of its roadways does not outweigh the resulting intrusion on the privacy and security of the persons detained. Given the physical and psychological intrusion visited upon the occupants of a vehicle by a random stop to check documents, cf. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U. 3. 873; United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U. S. 543, the marginal contribution to roadway safety possibly resulting from a system of spot checks cannot justify subjecting every occupant of every vehicle on the roads to a seizure at the unbridled discretion of law enforcement officials. Pp. 440 U. S. 655-661.

(c) An individual operating or traveling in an automobile does not lose all reasonable expectation of privacy simply because the automobile and its use are subject to government regulation. People are not shorn of all Fourth Amendment protection when they step from their homes onto the public sidewalk; nor are they shorn of those interests when they step from the sidewalks into their automobiles. Pp. 440 U. S. 662-663.

(d) The holding in this case does not preclude Delaware or other States from developing methods for spot checks that involve less intrusion or that do not involve the unconstrained exercise of discretion. Questioning of all oncoming traffic at roadblock-type stops is one possible alternative. P. 440 U. S. 663.
382 A.2d 1359, affirmed.

WHITE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which POWELL, J., joined, post, p. 440 U. S. 663. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 440 U. S. 664.


Twitter Should Ban Trump For His Constant Rule Breaking

Trump constantly breaks Twitter's rules and should be banned. Twitter bans people for a lot less than what the orange menace does.

The Twitter Rules


HA

Lying is the worst thing one can do on social media. Twitter is allowing Trump to lie lie lie daily but if someone were to call Trump a filthy lying treasonous cocksucker, Twitter would ban them even though Trump really is a filthy lying treason cocksucker.

  • Someone on Twitter is engaging in abusive or harassing ...

    https://help.twitter.com/forms/abusiveuser
    Someone on Twitter is engaging in abusive or harassing behavior ... Harassment . Specific violent ... You're about to report a user for making specific violent ...
  • How to Report Abuse, Harassment on Twitter - Home - Vorys

    https://www.internetdefamationlaw.com/how-to-report-abuse...
    Twitter says it does not tolerate abusive and harassing behavior. Read about how to report bad behavior such as wrongful, harmful impersonations on Twitter.
  • Twitter Is Still Dismissing Harassment Reports And ...

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/twitter-is...
    Harassment on Twitter was nothing new for ... Despite her report to Twitter and a request from BuzzFeed News for Twitter to explain why the account is not in ...
  • How to Report Abuse and Harassment on Twitter | The Mac ...