Censorship and Public Broadcasting

It has been my experience that the left censors and the right lies and censors. Since I switched Bigger Fatter Politics comments to Disqus I Fat Bastardo and my investigative journalists have encountered the usual lying but more troubling than lying is the Nazi style censorship. Privately owned websites can censor and most of them do but government funded sites like those overseen by public broadcasting aka PBS cannot censor but they do. Here is what one group of public radio stations is forbiding:

Your submissions may not infringe upon others' use and enjoyment of the SCPR Web sites.

Do not post any material or links to material that is libelous, defamatory, false, obscene, violent, abusive, threatening, harassing, prejudicial, employing profanity, or is otherwise in violation of the law or SCPR's guidelines. (If you see a violation of this policy in an SCPR discussion space, please report it on our Contact form.)

Nearly everyone of these forbidden criterion is the based on the judgment of some Nazi censor. Let's look at a few example:

Prejudicial: Mohammed was a pedophile. Anyone during anytime who would marry a six year old and begin fucking her when she was 9 is a pedophile but some PBS affiliates won't allow you to say that.  

Profanity: What is profanity? Shit but not poop? Intercourse but not fuck? Penis but not cock? Fellatio but not cock sucking?

Obscene: A priest molested a boy and got away with it or a priest rammed his cock down the throat of a boy and fucked his ass until he bled?

False: Obama is a gay Muslim or John McCain is a liar and a known wife beater?

Violent: We need to kill bin Laden or we need to kill the traitorous criminal elite who kill more innocent people than the terrorists?

Abusive: I respectfully disagree with you statement or you are a lying sack of shit?

Harassing: There are many contradictions in the Bible but I respect your faith or the Bible is a big fucking pack of lies and you are an idiot to believe it.

Your submission may be removed by us at our discretion, for any reason.

We will remove from the site any comment that violates our guidelines. In instances of willful abuse, we reserve the right to take whatever action we determine appropriate, including the termination of access privileges and legal action.

Some time ago Google censored and de indexed Bigger Fatter Blog based on complaints from angry jealous fat girls who hate men and hate the fact that I have proven that fat people gluttons. That is what they found offensive. Finally Google, not wanting to be sued removed the warning on my Bigger Fatter Blog and re-indexed it.

Google is a corporation and they have no obligation to protect freedom of speech and is at liberty to censor what ever they choose. There is no doubt about that. It's different with public broadcasting which is publicly funded.

I will be contacting free speech champion Larry Flint to inform him of this blatant violation of free speech.

It's no secret that the US is no longer a functioning democracy and President Jimmy Carter said as much while Ron Paul called American government corporatism and a mild form of fascism.

I am not the only one concerned about the disturbing censorship trend in public broadcasting.

If you have been a victim of 89.3 KPCC or other public broadcasting censorship please contact them and complain. Report your experience  to the ACLU of Southern California and see if they will file suit against PBS.

Censorship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_United_States

Wikipedia
Jump to Broadcast censorship - It can issue fines if, for example, the broadcaster employs ... foul language, and the coarsening of public entertainment in ...

‎History - ‎Film censorship - ‎Weapons proliferation - ‎Export of sensitive software
Did Public Television Commit Self-Censorship to Appease ...
www.democracynow.org/.../did_public_television_co...

Democracy Now!
May 30, 2013 - Filmmakers Tia Lessin and Carl Deal say plans for their new documentary to air on public television have been quashed after billionaire ...
Don't Let The Koch Brothers Censor Public Broadcasting!
act.watchdog.net/petitions/3100
Citizen Koch," a documentary on how Citizens United has warped American politics, was promised funding by public television, but executives withdrew support ...
Censorship In America - Laws
censorship.laws.com › ... › Censorship Laws › Freedom Of Speech
Censorship in America is the act of altering, adjusting, editing, or banning of ... A Public Broadcast is defined as a transmission of media through the usage of ...
Don't Censor Public Broadcasting - New York Times
www.nytimes.com/.../don-t-censor-public-broadcas...

The New York Times
Feb 6, 1992 - It's not surprising that the Republican Party's right wing finds public broadcasting "too liberal." Public television and radio reach out to diverse ...
Censorship on public television by the Editors - Jump Cut
www.ejumpcut.org/archive/.../EdlPublicTVCenshp.html

Jump Cut
At the same time, these sources, and the major outlet for film and video, public television, directly and indirectly censor work they disagree with politically.
Did Public Television Commit Self-Censorship to ... - YouTube
► 14:31► 14:31
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ljSr7cqNKg

YouTube
May 30, 2013 - Uploaded by democracynow
http://www.democracynow.org - Filmmakers Tia Lessin and Carl Deal say plans for their new documentary to air ...
Public Broadcasting Censorship Sparks Fiery Exchange at ...
nofilmschool.com/2013/.../public-broadcasting-censorship-ifp-film-week...
Sep 18, 2013 - Directors threw caution to the wind Monday at the IFP 2013 Film Week, engaging in a heated on-stage debate during the “When ...
Jane Mayer: How Far Did PBS Go to Avoid Offending a ...
www.newyorker.com/.../2013/.../130527fa_fact_mayer...

The New Yorker
May 27, 2013 - Public television's attempts to placate David Koch. ... of their new owners, either through executive mandates or through self-censorship.

Obama The Gun Grabber? NOT!

Conservative lying trash have said President Barack Obama is "coming for your guns" and had a "strategy" to get reelected and then "erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights."

But with gun policy again in the news after the Isla Vista shooting, it's worth considering that Obama's legacy on gun control may ultimately be defined by the executive orders he issued in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Conn. And absent any concerted effort by Congress, the fear that encouraged a spike in gun sales after Obama's election and reelection may have all been for naught.

Indeed, the president said after last September's massacre at the Washington Navy Yard that voters should pressure Congress to initiate gun control legislation, since he had already "taken steps that are within my control" after Newtown. In an election year in which Republicans need to pick up only six seats to retake the Senate, the prospects for a push on guns may seem dim to even the most optimistic supporter of reform.

And with that, a list of all the actions Obama has taken on guns. You'll notice he hasn't done much to restrict access:

That time he signed a bill allowing concealed loaded firearms in national parks.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) introduced an amendment in 2009 permitting concealed, loaded guns in national parks to a bill about credit cards, saying differences in state and federal laws inhibited gun owners from travel between state and federal lands.

And signed a bill allowing Amtrak passengers to store handguns in their checked baggage.

Advocates of the bill, also introduced in 2009, said it gave train riders rights comparable to those possessed by plane passengers. Amtrak had allowed firearms to be carried on trains before 9/11, so the bill represented a victory for gun rights activists.

After Newtown, Obama assembled a task force to address gun violence.

Obama charged Vice President Joe Biden in December 2012 with overseeing anadministration-wide process to develop proposals for Congress to take up. He urged lawmakers to reinstate a ban on assault weapons, close loopholes that allow buyers to avoid background checks and restrict high-capacity ammunition clips.

Then unveiled proposals to combat gun violence…

Obama's legislative proposals, released in January 2013, touched upon not just access to firearms and ammunition but school safety and mental health care.

And issued 23 executive actions.

A high point for the the White House on gun control was when Obama announced a flurry of executive actions accompanying his legislative proposals. The actions included requiring federal agencies to hand over relevant data for a background check system, providing more training for responders in shooting situations and restarting research on gun violence.

Only to see Congress take up just one of those proposals... and quickly shoot it down.

Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey's (R-Pa.) legislation on background checks fell short by five votes in April that year, even though nearly 90 percent of Americans favored strengthening such measures. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last month that he'd need more support from senators to revisit the bill.

But he did get to sign a renewal of an existing bill banning plastic firearms.

It appears that all Congress is capable of doing when it comes to gun control isauthorizing an extension of a prohibition against guns that can avoid detection by metal detectors and X-ray machines. Republicans went along with renewing the ban in December, but resisted tightening the restrictions.

Manuel Uribe World's Fattest Man DEAD

A Depressed Uribe Starved Down to a 867 pounds

The fatosphere is reeling from the sudden death of fattest man Manuel Uribe but instead of mourning his death we should be celebrating his life. He was the world's fattest man for fuck sake! THE WORLDS FATTEST MAN! According the an Associated Press report, "Manuel Uribe had slimmed down to about 867 pounds, well below his then-record peak weight of 1,230 pounds, which was certified in 2006 as a Guinness World Record." Well, there's the problem! Why wasn't HAES  (Health At Every Size) used? had he been given ALL the food he wanted instead of starved down to and an emaciated 876 pounds he would be alive today and maybe even competing as an elite Olympic track and field decathlete. 

Uribe was not your average glutton. He was a glutton's glutton. He represented  a glutton and a gluttonous life style that to which all fatlings wish to aspire. Let's break this down. 

Manuel Uribe's Impressive Numbers

• Resting (basal) metabolic rate: 12,882 calories per day
• Typical daily activities: 6441 calories per day
• Total calories burned: 19,324 per day

Simply to maintain his weight of 1230 pounds Uribe had to take in a whopping 19,324 calories a day. HOLY FUCK! To put that into perspective a man with a body weight of 160 pounds only needs 2500 calories to maintain his weight. This means that Uribe ate times as much food as the average man. Do you know how hard that is to do?! Let's put that into perspective and say that Uribe ate Subway low fat foot long subs. He would have to eat a super whopping 39 feet of Subway subs to reach 19,324 calories. That is nearly as tall as a 4 story building! 

No Man is an Island

What is more impressive about Uribe is the way he was able to employ and manipulate his feeding team. Left on his own Uribe would have been unable to obtain food and since he could not work he could not afford to buy food so how did he do it?

In happier times Uribe with his main squeeze and a cheese cake 

Large and in Charge!

Uribe had to muster, command and control a small army of feeders and other caretakers to enable him to live such a glorious fat and gluttonous life style. Originally NAAFA meant (National Association Aiding Fat Americans and shouldn't the proper mission of the fat acceptance movement be enabling fat people to live the fat and gluttonous lifestyle? His troops were faithful and dedicated. Uribe was a natural born leader. While in his four poster command center the majestic Uribe remained in complete charge of his loyal minions. 

The task of procuring all of his favorite dishes was monumental but beyond that the husbandry involved is his toileting alone had to be herculean. This fat hero was shitting more than a elephant. He was shitting constantly and shitting more than 8 regular sized people. Bathing him took a team of skilled and dedicated worshipers as well. 

He Died Young? Well Not Really

Uribe lived 45 years but since he was the size 8 normal people in fat people years he lived 360 years. We gluttons have a saying, It is not the quantity of life but the quality of life. Uribe has to eat constantly to maintain he weight so he was constantly happy content and satisfied. He outlived everyone! He had more happy moments than anyone. He had perpetual happiness until people conspired against him and starved him to death. Yes, you read that right, He was starved to death and here's why... CG Brady explains.

Yes Fat Bastardo, Mr Uribe was indeed starved to death. Uribe was placed on the Zone Diet.  The Zone Diet is a variation on Atkins and South Beach. Uribe was placed on a ridiculously low calorie diet that derived a large portions of calories from fat. As a result Uribe suffered severe liver damage. Uribe's liver was completely depleted of glycogen, the storage form of glucose.

Uribe could have lost the weight safely but that didn't happen is this case. Uribe lost 363 pounds very rabidly. The most weight he should have lost initially was 4 pounds per week. Had he been placed on 13,000 calories a day he would have lost nearly 13 pounds per week. For most people, losing 1 pound per week per 100 pounds of body weight is very safe especially if they get their nutrition right but these doctor endorsed starvation diets are not only cruel but they are dangerous. 

I can't say for certain whether carbohydrate and nutrient starvation was the only cause of Uribe's death but had to have played a role.

Elliot Rodger and Gun Control

This situation may or may not be about gun control. What it is about is a mentally compromised young man who got his hands on some guns. This is also about a health care system that let this young man and his family down and as a result of them not giving a shit about anything but money they let society down.

In nearly every mass shooting prescription psychiatric medications were involved. I don't know if this is the case in this mass shooting but chances are psych drugs played a role.

Rodger's parents went to authorities about their dangerous son but it seems that law enforcement's hands were tied. The TV shrinks have been busy talking out of their asses and espousing psychological theories postulating as to why he did what he did but none of them have so far  even brought up the role that prescription drugs played in these tragedies and they never do.

The corporate media won't even mention what the citizen civilian media is reporting when it comes to mass killings, guns and psychiatric medications. Here is what the civilian media is saying. I will present what a Google Search and a Youtube search revealed. Draw your own conclusions.

Related: Navy Yard Shooter On Trazadone CLICK HERE

Related: US Soldiers Drugged Into Suicide Click HERE

UPDATE: Therapist and Family Tried to Intervene Shortly Before Shooting Rampage

According to recent data released by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), in the first 155 days of this year, 154 soldiers committed suicide—about one per day—compared to the 139 soldiers who died in combat in the same period.

From 2001 to 2009, the Army’s suicide rate increased more than 150 percentwhile orders for psychiatric drugs rose 76 percent over the same period andaccording to Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, mental health disorders were the leading cause of hospitalization of active-duty service members in 2007, 2009 and 2011, with nearly $2 billion being spent on psychiatric drugs since 2001.

ISEPP Statement on the Connection Between Psychotropic ...
www.psychintegrity.org/isepp_statement_on_the_connection_between_p...



We are calling for an inquiry into the connection between these acts of mass murderand the use of psychotropic drugs. Although the media have cited family ...
School Shooters & Stabbings Committed by those on ...
www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/



32 school related acts of violence including shootings and stabbings were ... and not only includes mass shootings, but the use of knives, swords and bombs. ..... that is the truth, the docs give meds to mask the symptoms, not find the cause.
Another Mass Shooting, Another Psychiatric Drug? Federal ...
www.cchrint.org/.../the-aurora-colorado-tragedy-another-senseless-shoot...



Jul 20, 2012 - Note that all these mass shootings didn't just occur in the United States. ..... Many times doctors are prescribing SSRI meds to teenagers before ...
Psychiatric Medication And Mass Shootings - Is There A Link?
www.foodmatters.tv/.../is-there-a-link-between-psychiatric-...



Food Matters
In the tragic mass school shooting incidence at Newton Elementary the alleged shooter, has been ... If driving drunk is illegal, why isn't "driving on meds" illegal?
Virtually All Mass Shootings Linked Up With Violence Psych ...
www.storyleak.com/flashback-virtually-mass-shootings-linked-violence-i...



Sep 19, 2013 - The real cause of mass shootings such as Monday's Washington Naval Yard attack could be the psych drugs we now know Aaron Alexis was ...
Every mass shooting over last 20 years has one thing in ...

www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_dr...



by Mike Adams
Apr 2, 2013 - It reveals the real truth about mass shootings that bureaucrats and lawmakers are choosing to .... 3 of 4 known to have taken these samemeds.
When It Comes to School Shootings, Drugs Aren't the Problem
www.huffingtonpost.ca/.../antipyschotics-school-shootings_b_2467182....



Jan 15, 2013 - I've yet to hear anyone say "he must be on meds to act that way. .... If these drugs were the cause of these mass shootings, why are the ...
A Brief History of Psychotropic Drugs Prescribed to Mass ...
www.ladailypost.com/.../brief-history-psychotropic-drugs-prescribed-ma...



Jan 16, 2013 - During the debriefing, one of the participants stated that most of the mass shootings that have taken place were the result of domestic disputes, ...
Psychiatric Drugs and Mass Shootings ᴴᴰ - YouTube
► 11:21► 11:21
www.youtube.com/watch?v...



YouTube
Dec 16, 2012 - Uploaded by djgabrielpresents
Fact: At least fourteen recent school shootings were committed by those ... Psychiatric Drugs and Mass ...
Dramatic Increase of Mass Shootings in America: The Role ...
www.globalresearch.ca/...of-mass-shootings...psychiatric.../5358896



Nov 21, 2013 - “While the data about the ever-increasing random shootings is important, it doesn't mean spit unless someone in a position of power is willing ...

Bye Bye Democracy

I just stumbled across the blog Bye Bye Democracy and I am glad I did. I like citizen journalists who have the brains and the intellectual courage to think outside the box. Today the news media sucks at delivering the news their commentary is contrived, formulated and mind numbing and predictable in its cowardice. Without sounding too much like a conspiracy theorist I have to agree with others who see the media and cable news in particular as shameless propagandist for corporate interests.

The fact remains, our democracy is in jeopardy and while the news media pushes the mostly false left vs right pardigm the corporations and their super PACs have incrementally hijacked our government and our democracy. A free press is essential to the health of a democratic society but since the corporate media's agenda is often the same as the corporations and since the corporations own our government we really no longer have a free press. It up to citizen civilian journalists to report and comment on today's news with honesty and integrity.

The following is from Bye Bye Democracy....

And hello corporatism - the merger of state and corporate power. Also known as corporate capitalism, crony capitalism, corporate fascism, corporate oligarchy, inverted totalitarianism, corporatocracy and corpocracy. Take your pick. Also applicable: kleptocracy, mockracy and pathocracy. 

The Dangers of Aspertame aka Nutrasweet

We fatlings in addition to loving savory foods we also like sweet food. Many a fatling order a couple of double beef Whoppers and fries only to wash it all down with a giant diet Coke. Fat girls in denial would shovel down 2000 calories of delicious fast food in one sitting because they think diet drinks somehow counteract the effects of calories. The true fatling shoot up with a little extra insulin and then orders up an extra large shake along with a regular Coke.

The faithful reader of Bigger Fatter Politics know that we are not an anti-weight loss organization like the NAAFA style angry jealous fat girl brand of Fat Acceptance because we know that not everyone can "handle the fat"  so we don't oppose the use of artificial sweeteners so long as they are safe. Fat people have enough health issues to worry about and diabetes is just one of them.

The following article spells out the danger of Nutrasweet the most widely used artificial sweetener.

Aspartame—"A Chemical Poison"?  By Dr Mercola Click for more information on Nutrasweet

The book "Prescription for Nutritional Healing" by James and Phyllis Balch lists aspartame under the category of "chemical poison." While many still refuse to believe that toxic or otherwise health-harming ingredients would be allowed to be used in food manufacturing, the evidence against aspartame and other artificial sweeteners is, in my opinion, overwhelming...
Aspartame is made up of three chemicals:

1. Phenylalanine (50 percent)—Phenylalanine is an amino acid normally found in your brain. Persons with the genetic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU) cannot metabolize phenylalanine and must avoid it at all costs to prevent the accumulation of phenylalanine in their brain, which can be lethal. It has been shown that ingesting aspartame, especially along with carbohydrates, can lead to excess levels of phenylalanine in the brain even in persons who do not have PKU. Excessive levels of phenylalanine in your brain can decrease your serotonin levels, which in turn can provoke emotional disorders such as depression.
2. Aspartic acid (40 percent)—According to the work of Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, a professor of neurosurgery at the Medical University of Mississippi, there are about 500 scientific references showing that excess free excitatory amino acids such as aspartic acid and glutamic acid (about 99 percent of monosodium glutamate (MSG) is glutamic acid) in our food supply are causing serious chronic neurological disorders and a myriad of other acute symptoms.
Aspartate and glutamate act as neurotransmitters in your brain by facilitating the transmission of information from neuron to neuron. Excess aspartate or glutamate in your brain can kill off neurons by allowing the influx of too much calcium into your cells. This influx triggers excessive amounts of free radicals, which kill the cells. The neural cell damage that can be caused by excessive aspartate and glutamate is why they are referred to as "excitotoxins." They literally "excite" or stimulate your neural cells to death. It is important not to confuse this with the amino acid glutamic acid, which is a normal part of foods and an important nutrient.

3.  Methanol (10 percent)—Methanol, also known as wood alcohol, is a deadly poison. It is gradually released in your small intestine once the methyl group of aspartame encounters the digestive enzyme chymotrypsin. Inside your body, methanol breaks down into formic acid and formaldehyde, the latter of which is another lethal neurotoxin and a known carcinogen, which passes freely through your blood brain barrier to cause brain damage.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), methanol is considered "a cumulative poison due to the low rate of excretion once it is absorbed. In the body, methanol is oxidized to formaldehyde and formic acid; both of these metabolites are toxic." The EPA recommends limiting consumption of methanol to 7.8 mg/day. A one-liter (approx. 1 quart) aspartame-sweetened beverage contains about 56 mg of methanol. Heavy users of aspartame-containing products can consume as much as 250 mg of methanol daily, or 32 times the EPA limit.

Aspartame Is Carcinogenic

In 2006, the Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center of the European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences released a study which revealed that aspartame can induce a wide range of malignancies in rodents, including lymphoma and leukemia, concluding that aspartame is a potential carcinogen at doses much less (20 mg/kg bw) than the current acceptable daily intake (ADI) for humans in Europe (40 mg/kg bw) and in the United States (50 mg/kg bw). .[4]

A follow-up study published in 2007 confirmed and reinforced aspartame's "multipotential carcinogenicity" at a dose level close to the ADI for humans, including the discovery that fetal exposure results in increasing its carcinogenic effects later in life.[5]