Saturday, March 29, 2014

Marilyn Monroe's Weight and Measurements

COVID 19 Statistics

United States cases

Updated May 16 at 2:40 PM local

Confirmed

1,473,415

+13,256

Deaths

88,237

+1,019

Recovered

260,146

+5,159

Coronavirus (COVID-19) statistics

United States cases

Updated May 16 at 7:50 PM local

Confirmed

1,496,632

+24,206

Deaths

89,404

+1,260

Recovered

272,386

+13,348

From May 16 2:40 pm to May 16 7:50 pm 1167 Americans have died from COVID-19. That is over 1000 people every 5 hours who have died from COVID-19. That's over 5000 Americans per day who are killed by COVID-19!

United States cases

Updated Sep 13 at 12:23 AM local

Confirmed

6,572,668

+44,253

Deaths

196,546

+757

Recovered

3,555,677

+20,388

Sorry Trump and sorry MAGAts, COVID 19 is not a hoax so shut your filthy lie holes!

Jealous angry fat girls in deep denial are trying to say that Marlyn Monroe was fat as they refer to themselves as "curvy". Fat girls can be so pathetic that is it laughable! They lie almost as much as Trump.

According to measurements from Marilyn Monroe's dressmaker:
Height: 5 feet, 5½ inches That makes her BMI 19.3 - 18.8
Weight: 118 pounds (That's her highest weight)
Bust: 35-37 inches
Waist: 22-23 inches
Hips: 35-36 inches
Bra size: 36D

The fat girls like to lie and say that Marilyn Monroe was fat. That's a bunch of total fucking BULLSHIT!

There is no way Marylin Monroe was a size 12 - 16

Fat girls lie, cry, deny and eat pie.

So what size was Marilyn Monroe actually? Luckily, many of her dresses, carefully preserved, are still around from which to obtain accurate measurements. Further, one of her dress makers also chimed in with exact measurements he took. Those measurements were 5 ft. 5.5 inches tall; 35 inch bust; 22 inch waist (approximately 2-3 inches less than the average American woman in the 1950s and 12 inches less than average today); and 35 inch hips, with a bra size of 36D. Her weight fluctuated a bit through her career, usually rising in times of depression and falling back to her normal thereafter, but her dressmaker listed her as 118 pounds and the Hollywood studios tended to list her between 115-120 lbs. With a 22" waist slacks for Miss Monroe would be smaller than a size 0. Take that you jealous fat girls.

Lucky for her, she could afford to have her clothing custom made, which she usually did.
As a direct example of her size, the white dress she wore in The Seven Year Itch was recently auctioned off and was put on a mannequin that was a size 2, but they were still unable to zip up the dress as the mannequin was too big. Many of her other dresses that exist from throughout her career match up to about the same, give or take an inch or two. That being said, Marilyn Monroe at times would have her dresses so tight they’d have to be sewn onto her, so something more comfortable in a size 4-ish (American) and something like an 8 in the U.K. is probably more accurate with most brands, though it should be noted that a 22 inch waist in many popular American jean sizes today would be below a 0. So, again, the exact size is difficult to nail down thanks to the non-standardized sizing system we have today.

Looky Looky COLLAR BONES!

If you’re curious as to how that compares to modern contemporary fashion models, according to BluFire Model Registry, models are generally in the vicinity of a 34 bust; 24 waist; and 34 hips, which is very close to Monroe’s measurements of 35-22-35.

They list the average model today at 5 ft. 8 inches, to Monroe’s 5 ft 5.5 inches. Elizabeth Hurley, who in the above quote called Marilyn Monroe “fat”, actually has around the same dimensions: 34-24-34, though is about 5 inches taller than Monroe was.

If anyone can look at Elizabeth Hurley and call her anorexic then they must be a delusional, jealous and lying fat girl.

There is no way no how that Ms Hurley is underweight and no what that Marilyn Monroe was fat!

So what size was Marilyn Monroe actually? Luckily, many of her dresses, carefully preserved, are still around to measure off of. Further, one of her dress makers also chimed in with exact measurements he took. Those measurements were 5 ft. 5.5 inches tall; 35 inch bust; 22 inch waist (approximately 2-3 inches less than the average American woman in the 1950s and 12 inches less than average today); and 35 inch hips, with a bra size of 36D. Her weight fluctuated a bit through her career, usually rising in times of depression and falling back to her normal thereafter, but her dressmaker listed her as 118 pounds and the Hollywood studios tended to list her between 115-120 lbs.
As to what size Marilyn Monroe would be in women’s sizes today, that’s not an easy thing to answer due to the differing sizes from brand to brand, country to country, and the fact that her extreme hour glass shape would have made it difficult for her to find the perfect size while clothes shopping. Lucky for her, she could afford to have her clothing custom made, which she usually did.
As a direct example of her size, the white dress she wore in The Seven Year Itch was recently auctioned off and was put on a mannequin that was a size 2, but they were still unable to zip up the dress as the mannequin was too big. Many of her other dresses that exist from throughout her career match up to about the same, give or take an inch or two. That being said, Marilyn Monroe at times would have her dresses so tight they’d have to be sown onto her, so something more comfortable in a size 4-ish (American) and something like an 8 in the U.K. is probably more accurate with most brands, though it should be noted that a 22 inch waist in many popular American jean sizes today would be below a 0. So, again, the exact size is difficult to nail down thanks to the non-standardized sizing system we have today.
If you’re curious as to how that compares to modern contemporary fashion models, according to BluFire Model Registry, models are generally in the vicinity of a 34 bust; 24 waist; and 34 hips, which is very close to Monroe’s measurements of 35-22-35. They list the average model today at 5 ft. 8 inches, to Monroe’s 5 ft 5.5 inches. Elizabeth Hurley, who in the above quote called Marilyn Monroe “fat”, actually has around the same dimensions: 34-24-34, though is about 5 inches taller than Monroe was.

Read more at http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/04/marilyn-monroe-was-not-even-close-to-a-size-12-16/#36mH7mRCD4Y5Q0mc.99

As to what size Marilyn Monroe would be in women’s sizes today, that’s not an easy thing to answer due to the differing sizes from brand to brand, country to country, and the fact that her extreme hour glass shape would have made it difficult for her to find the perfect size while clothes shopping. Lucky for her, she could afford to have her clothing custom made, which she usually did.
As a direct example of her size, the white dress she wore in The Seven Year Itch was recently auctioned off and was put on a mannequin that was a size 2, but they were still unable to zip up the dress as the mannequin was too big. Many of her other dresses that exist from throughout her career match up to about the same, give or take an inch or two. That being said, Marilyn Monroe at times would have her dresses so tight they’d have to be sown onto her, so something more comfortable in a size 4-ish (American) and something like an 8 in the U.K. is probably more accurate with most brands, though it should be noted that a 22 inch waist in many popular American jean sizes today would be below a 0. So, again, the exact size is difficult to nail down thanks to the non-standardized sizing system we have today.

Read more at http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/04/marilyn-monroe-was-not-even-close-to-a-size-12-16/#36mH7mRCD4Y5Q0mc.99

Marilyn Monroe was Not Even Close to a Size 12-16

Daven Hiskey April 17, 2012 85

Myth: Marilyn Monroe was a size 12-16.
From Roseanne Barr stating, “I’m more sexy than Pamela Lee or whoever else they’ve got out there these days. Marilyn Monroe was a size 16. That says it all”, to Elizabeth Hurley stating, “I’ve always thought Marilyn Monroe looked fabulous, but I’d kill myself if I was that fat…I went to see her clothes in the exhibition, and I wanted to take a tape measure and measure what her hips were. She was very big”, you’ll often hear people saying Marilyn Monroe was around the same size as the average American woman today (12-16). In fact, nothing could be further from the truth, at least by today’s sizing systems.
How this myth got started isn’t exactly known. One possible contributing factor to this myth was Marilyn Monroe’s atypical extreme hour glass shape. More directly, it probably partially stems from the fact that women’s sizes today are not at all equivalent to women’s sizes in the 1950s. In the 1980s, in order to accommodate people’s vanity and ever expanding girth, the U.S. Department of Commerce got rid of the uniform sizing system and instead allowed for more ego stroking sizes. As a result of this, today, a size 8 would have been roughly equivalent to a size 16-18 in the 1950s, obviously though this varies a shocking amount from brand to brand.
So what size was Marilyn Monroe actually? Luckily, many of her dresses, carefully preserved, are still around to measure off of. Further, one of her dress makers also chimed in with exact measurements he took. Those measurements were 5 ft. 5.5 inches tall; 35 inch bust; 22 inch waist (approximately 2-3 inches less than the average American woman in the 1950s and 12 inches less than average today); and 35 inch hips, with a bra size of 36D. Her weight fluctuated a bit through her career, usually rising in times of depression and falling back to her normal thereafter, but her dressmaker listed her as 118 pounds and the Hollywood studios tended to list her between 115-120 lbs.

Marilyn Monroe:
Height: 5 feet 5½ inchesBust: 35-37 inches
Waist: 22-23 inches
Hips: 35-36 inches
Bra size: 36D

Fat girls need to STFU and stop trying to make themselves feel better by lying about Marilyn Monroe! Marilyn Monroe's body was NORMAL and you fat bitches need to stop reinventing history and take your false narrative and shove it up your great big giant stinky asses. OINK!

IN OTHER NEWS: WHY TRUMP IS A SUSPECT IN JEFF EPSTEIN'S MURDER

See the world's biggest ass here!

See the source image

Medical Error Statistics

Unless you have been living under a rock for the last 30 years you probably already know that American doctors are poorly trained, ignorant, arrogant, callous and greedy cowardly money whores who work mostly for health care facilities run by disease exploiting criminal corporate gangsters. Just like health care acquired infections and adverse drug reactions medical errors rake in huge amounts of revenue for the medical corporations. This is why medical errors remain on the rise.

Shocking Trend: Medical Errors Have Increased Dramatically in the U.S.

By Editor, on April 16th, 2011

A new editorial in The Lancet medical journal cites staggering statistics that medical errors now occur in as many one-third of all U.S. hospitalizations.

The editors present other attention-getting statistics from several scientific studies establishing that medical errors remain a serious problem in the U.S. and appear to have increased over the last 10 years, despite national attention called to this problem.

The Lancet editors ask, “Why?” And, they make some suggestions that should well be considered by medical professionals, patients and caregivers, and policy makers in the U.S.

The Alarming Statistics:

The editorial, entitled, “Medical errors in the USA: human or systemic?“, appears in the April 16, 2011 Issue of The Lancet. It cites and describes the findings of several published studies on medical errors in the U.S. by recognized U.S. scientific and professional sources. Among them are the following:

The US Institute of Medicine’s 1999 report, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, estimated that avoidable medical errors contributed annually to 44,000—98,000 deaths in US hospitals. Hospital errors were reported to constitute the eighth leading cause of death nationally, accounting for more U.S. deaths than breast cancer, AIDS, and motor-vehicle accidents. This drew national attention to the problem.
Yet, more than 10 years later, the problem of medical errors remains and seems to have increased. A new study reported in the April, 2011 issue of Health Affairs, found that by one measure, medical errors occur in as many as one-third of hospital admissions in the U.S., and may be ten times greater than previously measured. “The most common are medication errors, followed by surgical errors, procedure errors, and nosocomial infections,” according to The Lancet’s review of the study.
The study, conducted by scientists and professionals at three leading U.S. medical schools as well as at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, compared three different methods commonly used for measuring “adverse events” in hospitals: (i) voluntary reporting, (ii) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Patient Safety Indicators (which rely on automated review of discharge codes to detect adverse events), and (iii) the Global Trigger Tool pioneered by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (based upon independent review of medical charts, with follow up investigation where indicated).

The study found that this third method measured at least ten times more confirmed serious medical errors than did the other two methods. As observed by The Lancet’s editorial, “This finding suggests that the two currently used methods for detecting medical errors in the USA are unreliable, underestimate the real burden, and also risk misdirection of present efforts to improve patient safety.”
A study reported in the November 25, 2010 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, also confirmed that medical errors in U.S. hospitals are a serious problem. The study, conducted by lead author Christopher Landrigan, M.D., M.P.H. of the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and a group of doctors from Harvard Medical School, Standford University School of Medicine, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, reported that even in places where local governments have made efforts to improve safety of inpatient care, such as in hospitals in North Carolina, the high rate of detected medical errors did not change over a 5-year period between 2002 and 2007.
A November, 2010, document from the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services reported that one in seven Medicare beneficiaries have complications from medical errors when hospitalized, and that these medical errors contribute to about 180,000 deaths of patients per year.
A study by Jill Van Den Bos and other professionals of Milliman’s Denver Health practice reported in the April, 2011 Issue of Health Affairs found that the measurable cost of US medical errors amounted to US $17.1 Billion in 2008 (0.72% of the $2.39 trillion spent on health care that year). Ten types of error accounted for more than two-thirds of the total cost of medical errors. The top two most costly medical errors are postoperative infections and pressure ulcers. The three most common medical errors were pressure ulcers, post-operative infections, and postlaminectomy syndrome.
Another study, conducted by John Goodman and associates of the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas, TX and also reported in the April, 2011 Issue of Health Affairs, reported that medical errors cause as many as 187,000 deaths in hospitals each year, and 6.1 million injuries, both in and out of hospitals in the U.S. This study estimated that the social costs, in lives lost and disabilities caused, from these medical errors amounted to between $393 Billion to $958 Billion in 2006, equivalent to 18% to 45% of total US health-care spending in that year. These authors recommended as a possible solution that patients should be “offered voluntary, no-fault insurance prior to treatment or surgery [so that they] would be compensated if they suffered an adverse event—regardless of the cause of their misfortune—and providers would have economic incentives to reduce the number of such events.”

Greedy filthy cocksuckers!

Click Here to See How Much Your Doctor is Stealing

http://www.helpingyoucare.com/12784/alarming-trend-medical-errors-have-increased-in-the-u-s

Doctors vs Guns

Here are a few statistics on Doctors vs Gun Owners:

With MDs it's money first!

Doctors
*safety statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services.

The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.

Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000.

Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171

Now think about this:

With gun owners it's safety first.

Gun Owners
*safety statistics courtesy of FBI.

The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000. (Yes, that’s 80 million)

The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500.

The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .0000188

Statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.

FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT Almost everyone has at least one doctor. This means you are over 9,000 times more likely to be killed by a doctor as by a gun owner!!! Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!!

Out of concern for the public at large, We withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention!

Friday, March 28, 2014

Ed Schultz Challenges Hannity To Obamacare Debate -- Hannity Declines Chickens Out

By Heather November 2, 2013 5:00 am - 68 Comments

MSNBC's Ed Schultz has had about enough of Fox's Sean Hannity and his constant attacks and lies on the rollout of the Affordable Care Act and he let him have it again on this Friday's show. Read more...

We all know that Hannity is a liar and since he is a Republican he is also a lying chicken shit!

Chris Christie Cleared: Well Not Really

Here's how it worked. Christie committed a serious crime and he hired and payed lawyers with taxpayer money to "investigate" his roll in Bridgegate and then clear him of any wrong doing. If you believe this was fair you are an asshole.

Let's say for sake of argument that Christie's handpicked New Jersey thug lawyers were on the up&up, even they admit that the Christie administration is a cesspool or corruption and mismanagement.

http://www.myfoxny.com/story/25090189/christies-lawyer-governor-not-involved-in-plot

WARNING! Facts and Sources Ahead!!

Christie was cleared of wrongdoing by the lawyers he hired. Pick your link!

http://www.latimes.com/nation/...

A two-month investigation by a team of lawyers hired by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has determined he wasn't at fault for the lane closure scandal last year.

http://time.com/40073/chris-ch...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...

From the report: "The mammoth document paints a portrait of a governor’s office with structural flaws severe enough that the attorneys believe it must be cleaned up by an ethics czar and constituent advocate."

Christie will prove to be even more incompetent that GW Bush if elected president.

Romneycare VS Obamacare

The irony of Republican disapproval of Obamacare

The Democrat's version of health insurance would have been cheaper, simpler and more popular. But we enacted the Republican version. So why are they so upset? Because it an achievement for the Obama administration.

Had Obamacare been proposed by a Republican which it orginally was you would not hear

the lying Republicans whining like a bunch of pathetic crybabies.

Obamacare is actually a a 1992 Republican idea and it is very similar to Romneycare

President Obama has said that the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) borrows heavily from similar legislation at the state level (aka Romneycare) implemented in Massachusetts in 2006 and passed by then governor Mitt Romney. We examine the similarities and differences between the two pieces of legislation, and also note how liar Romney's current healthcare policy differs from the 2006 law he passed.

The retards/Republicans knew Romney was a RINO and in spite of the fact that the GOP had actual conservative candidates and two sane ones ie Ron Paul and John Huntsman they ended up picking the most liberal one.

Even though Romneycare is not as good as Obamacare the people in Massachusetts like it.

</> Embed this chart

After 5 Years of Obama

Suck on it CONS!

Tawny Kitaen: Another Republican Slut

I'm an "Out of the closet Rep" n hollywood (easier to be gay or a size 22)but 2B a Rep, OMG I'm an anomaly! & I have2say Obamas sexy BUT I'm

6:26 PM - 16 Oct 2012

Drunk Slut Republican Tawny Kitaen

Legal Troubles for Consummate Republican Kitaen

In 2002, Kitaen was charged with domestic violence for an incident involving her then-husband, professional baseball player Chuck Finley.^[11] Three days later, Finley filed for divorce.^[11] After aplea bargain, Kitaen agreed to "enter a spousal battery counseling program and avoid contact with Finley."^[11] The couple were married for five years and have two daughters, Wynter and Raine.^[12]

In November 2006, prosecutors charged Kitaen with possessing 15 grams of cocaine in her San Juan Capistrano home in Orange County. The authorities said her two children were home at the time and Kitaen had given deputies permission for the search.^[13] In December 2006, she entered a six-month rehabilitation program in exchange for the dismissal of a felony drug possessioncharge.^[4]^[14]^[15]

On September 26, 2009, Kitaen was arrested for driving under the influence in Newport Beach, California.^[

Bigger Fatter Politics

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Marilyn Monroe's Weight and Measurements

COVID 19 Statistics

Coronavirus (COVID-19) statistics

Marilyn Monroe was Not Even Close to a Size 12-16

Medical Error Statistics

Shocking Trend: Medical Errors Have Increased Dramatically in the U.S.

Friday, March 28, 2014

Ed Schultz Challenges Hannity To Obamacare Debate -- Hannity Declines Chickens Out

Ed Schultz Challenges Hannity To Obamacare Debate -- Hannity Declines Chickens Out

Chris Christie Cleared: Well Not Really

Romneycare VS Obamacare

The irony of Republican disapproval of Obamacare

The Democrat's version of health insurance would have been cheaper, simpler and more popular. But we enacted the Republican version. So why are they so upset? Because it an achievement for the Obama administration.

After 5 Years of Obama

Tawny Kitaen: Another Republican Slut

Legal Troubles for Consummate Republican Kitaen

Sites Trump Supporters Hate