Sunday, June 1, 2014

Obesity and Self Esteem

Fat People Have High Self Esteem No Thanks to Fat Acceptance



Sista doin it for hersef!


A picture speaks a thousand words. Fat acceptance would like you to believe that fat people suffer from low self esteem. Nothing could be further from the truth. A study of 100 pre and post weight loss surgery patients found that the only improvement psychologically for WLS patients was less worry about health issues. In reality that is false hope because statistically WLS actually decreases lifespan and it kills one in 100 patients/victims. I have always known that fat is not a psychological disease whereas anorexia and bulimia are most certainly a brain based psychological disorders. No evidence exists that fat people's emotional and psychological states are any different than the general population. The crazies in the fat acceptance crowd like Kelley Bliss with their "We're all victims of fat hatred" and fat haters like MeMe Roth have confused body image with self image. If fat bodied people really suffer low self esteem, they would not accept being fat and they would maintain a healthy weight. We are not a bunch of weak-willed gluttons. We choose and embrace our size as well as our gormandizing ways.

The following article by Psychologist Roberta Themes PhD further amplifies the position of Bigger Fatter Blog, Bigger Fatter Politics and the New Fat Acceptance.

thanksgiving-turkey-a.gif
Pride and Gluttony at Work!




The Myth Of Low Self Esteem In Overweight People
http://euroross.blogspot.com/Fat%20and%20Smoking.jpg
By Roberta Temes, PhD 

Did you know that the idea of a fat person having low self esteem is a myth? Humans come in various shapes and sizes. Every psychological test given to overweight people indicates that if you are fat you are as mentally healthy, or unhealthy, as anyone in the general population. There is nothing about overeating that is associated with poor emotional health. In fact, it is possible that obese people are emotionally stronger than slim people because many slim folks who were interviewed said they'd stay at home if they were obese.. they would not have the psychological fortitude to be seen in public if they were heavy.
http://www.herpes.ru/hudo/hum/fat_girl.jpghttp://today.ccopinion.com/images/uploads/2007/04/kate-moss-chubby-friend.jpg


There was a time, right here in the USA, when only the most successful folks were heavy and everyone else tried to emulate them. Large bodies were proof of robust health and substantial wealth. But, in America in the 21st century fat is out, thin is in.

Obesity is
 not a psychological disorder. Obesity is not an eating disorder. Fat people have a genetic predisposition to gain weight called gluttony and if they wish to conform to today's ideal of slimness and if they want to maintain good health, they must counteract their inborn biological impulses. This is possible. Difficult, but possible. Particularly possible if you have a diet buddy or buddies.

Fat Bastardo's comment: It's not hard to lose weight and keep it off but why bother? Food is SOOOOO good. I have a lot of diet buddies. They are greedy gluttons just like me Fat Bastardo.

Our genes may give us the capacity and tendency to eat much and gain much, but it is our environment, our habits, that permit the tendency to flourish. Thankfully, we can change our environment and thus fool Mother Nature. You can be a slim person, after all. You can counteract your inborn biologic capacity.

Fat Bastardo's Comment: Actually we don't have a genetic predisposition to be gluttonous. The old NAAFA saying "fat by nature proud by choice" is gluttony denial with is the epitome of fat hatred. The saying should be "Proud By Nature Fat By Choice." Gluttony is GOOD! 

Dr. Jules Hirsch, the famous obesity researcher at Rockefeller University, says that obesity should be treated as a chronic disease for which there is no cure but for which there are management techniques. And those techniques do work. But, it's up to you to apply them every day.

Fat Bastardo comments: Obesity is not a disease because if it were a disease the obesity rate would be the same as 40 years ago as it is now. This is more fat hatred. We fatlings are not sick. We are fat and happy but this calling our chosen lifestyle a disease is pissing me off!

You override your genetic destiny when you eat when you are not hungry or when you eat only low-calorie foods when you are hungry. It's the gene that opens your mouth that is responsible for overeating.




Fat Bastardo comments: I only wish that there was a fat gene but unfortunately that fat gene is quite rare and only the super super morbidly obese have it. Giving a gene credit is an insult to out gluttony.

How do you want to manage your weight? You can do it, you know. You can go for surgery and staple your stomach. You can go to a diet doctor and get lots of pills. You can stop eating solids and go on a liquid diet. You can get group support via the Internet. You can lessen urges by acupressure, acupuncture, or aversion therapy. You can count calories or fat grams. You can use hypnosis. And the list goes on and on. There is no shortage of diet programs.

Fat Bastardo Comments: Here is how I manage my weight. I eat whatever the fuck I want. Like our freind the Chef I too am a big man with a big appetite and I "ain't makin no apologies for it" and that is what separates me from the many run of the mill gluttons who are shameful gluttony deniers!
In my practice everyone who wants to lose weight does lose because we add hypnosis to the mix. Hypnotic suggestions make it easier to stick to whatever program you decide to follow. And it is crucial to follow a program. Talk to others and find out about a program that may be new to you. Remember, any diet program will work if you follow it.  

Fat Bastardo comments: The good doctor is right and I am living proof I follow something similar to Linda Bacon's HAES Health At Every Size only my plan is called EATT Eat All The Time developed by Dr Otto Grazenheimer  and let me tell you... It fucking works great! I also use Dr Varken Oinkin's FATT or Food All The Time. 

Related: Why Self Esteem is Myth



Mark011-1.jpg Mark in his element! picture by mzichlin
These people are really fucking happy and we don't need them portrayed as tragic victims by the fat haters and the fat acceptance loony birds.

Fat chicks know how to party and they are not afraid to flaunt it!!


More fat and happy BBWs flaunting their flab!








Saturday, May 31, 2014

Nazis vs Doctors

It's hard to put an exact number on how much wealth the Nazis stole from the Jews before they killed them but it was a huge number. Essentially the Nazis stole from the Jews and then maimed and killed them. All told the Nazis killed at least 6 million of them. A lot of politically correct people like to say that Hitler killed 6 million Jews. He didn't. Germans and Catholic priests of the Ustase killed the 6 million Jews along with Gypsies and homosexuals. The death toll exceeded 6 million from 1938 to 1945 totaling 7 years of carnage.

The carnage caused by the US medical industry has that beat. The Nazis, fascists and the Ustase combined killed slightly less than a million a year. Death on that scale is called a holocaust. The American medical industrial complex kills over 1 million people per year that that figure is based on what gets reported as medical industry induced death. When it comes to preventable deaths the medical industrial complex kills more Americans than smoking and gluttony combined. The medical industry's doctors alone are the third leading cause of preventable deaths and once again, that is based on what gets reported. To put that into perspective guns kill around 50,000 Americans each year and most of those deaths are accidental shootings and suicides. There are about 100 million gun owners in the US and only 700,000 doctors.

Click Here for unbiased gun facts.

Not even the most brazen gun nut will argue that we have too many gun deaths and that preventing gun deaths of all kinds is a good thing. Unfortunately not too many doctors really give a shit that they are killing people at a higher rate than the Nazis did.  Wayne Lapierre nut job than he is and his NRA is doing more to prevent gun deaths than the medical industry and its doctors are doing to prevent medical deaths.

The Piety and the Hypocrisy of it Astounds

Every few months some nut with a gun shoots up a school or a mall and the simple minded knee jerk reaction from the left starts and then come the equally stupid reactions from the right starts and in the end there is a stalemate and in a month or so another nut with a gun goes on a shooting rampage. The corporate media foams at the mouth and the talking heads spew the same tired bullshit, lefties and righties try to score political points and nothing gets down.

In every shooting massacre there is a common thread... prescription psychiatric medications which include the deadly SSRI drugs, psycho stimulants, Chantix, Lunesta and Ambien ect... Somehow the media never mentions the drug connection.

Related: Medical Care In the US is the Deadliest

The fact is there are far less gun owners now than there were 40 years ago. There are million more people on psychiatric medications and now there are gun massacres every few months but for greed some reason the news media won't point out those facts. They also won't point out that we have been in a medical holocaust for the past 40 years and that the death toll caused by the medical industrial complex and its flunky doctors have killed more people than, Stalin's Hitler's Mao's purges combined.

Click here to read a free copy of Death By Medicine

Medical journals report that pharmaceutical-based medicine is one of the leading causes of death & injury in developed countries.

These articles explain so you can avoid becoming a victim.

a blue dot impersonating a bullet Death By Medicine - scientific studies show medical treatment may be the leading cause of death. 
"A definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows ... The total number of iatrogenic deaths [that means deaths caused by medical treatment] ... is 783,936 [per year]. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States."
blue line image
a blue dot impersonating a bullet Why Do Pharmaceutical Drugs Injure & Kill Millions of Humans? Are We the Real "Guinea-pigs"? . . . Medical journals report that pharmaceutical drugs injure millions and kill hundreds of thousands of people each year. This article examines how drug companies: i) use flexible unscientific tests to make their products look "safe"; ii) can then use those flexible tests as a legal defence to avoid punishment.
blue line image
a blue dot impersonating a bullet Myths of Modern Medicine: The Increase in the Human Life Span - due to Medicine or Political Social Reforms? This article explains that the great increase in human life span in the developed world (during the 19th and 20th centuries) was due to political social reforms like better sanitation systems, improved hygiene and nutrition. It wasnot due to pharmaceutical drugs or other medical interventions.
blue line image
a blue dot impersonating a bullet Myths of Modern Medicine: The Decline of the Infectious Diseases mostly occurred before commercial vaccines, immunisations and drugs were developed for them. This page contains numerous graphs and diagrams that illustrate the statistics and trends.
blue line image
a blue dot impersonating a bullet A History of Western Medicineexcerpts from a book by the medical historian Hans Ruesch. From antiquity to modern times, an explanation of the major advances in human medicine and how they came through the scientific, clinical and ethical study of humans. Furthermore, of how medical progress was often stalled and led astray for many centuries due to misleading results from unscientific methods of research.




death by medicine medical damages

Let's Talk Costs

Nobody in Washington gives a shit about the human costs. It's all about money to them but if you Google "Let's Talk Costs Blue Cross Blue Shield" you find that the medical industry steals 1/3 of every dollar Americans pay for health that through waste and fraud. Waste is fraud. And this is based on what waste and fraud gets reported. That 1/3 figure comes to $750 BILLION per year. That's more than we spend on national defense.

Conclusion: The American Medical Industrial Complex kills and steals more than Hitler's Nazis.

If you are too lazy to fact check me here's a start.

Medical errors kill enough people to fill four jumbo jets a week." says The Wall Street Journal

"200,000 to 400,000 deaths per year from preventable harm in hospitals" reports "A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care" published in the Journal of Patient Safety September 2013.

"It seems that every time researchers estimate how often a medical mistake contributes to a hospital patient's death, the numbers come out worse." laments Scientific American Yet, with the notable exceptions of The Wall Street Journal, Scientific American and a tiny handful of other sources, the Main Stream Media is silent on this critical issue.

"When there is a plane crash in the U.S., even a minor one, it makes headlines. There is a thorough federal investigation, and the tragedy often yields important lessons for the aviation industry. Pilots and airlines thus learn how to do their jobs more safely.

The world of American medicine is far deadlier: Medical mistakes kill enough people each week to fill four jumbo jets. But these mistakes go largely unnoticed by the world at large, and the medical community rarely learns from them." The WSJ goes to the say in their excellent article titled "How to Stop Hospitals From Killing Us."

With 200,000 - 400,000 deaths per annum Medical Errors are now the 3rd leading cause of death right behind Heart disease with 597,689 deaths per annum and Cancer with 574,743 deaths per annum.

But the CDC does not even mention Medical Errors in their report on the leading causes of death

Doesn't the CDC have a responsibility to tell you that occasionally seeking conventional medical treatment will kill you faster than driving your car (34,080 deaths by auto accident 2102), day in and day out every day of your life?  

Why the cover up?


Search Results




  1. Medical care is the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S.

    chriskresser.com/medical-care-is-the-3rd-leading-cause-of-death...
    This means that doctors and hospitals are responsible for more deaths each year ... Leave it to the medical industry “Public health” to downplay the effects of ...
  2. Pharmaceutical Companies Accused of Criminal Actions

    articles.mercola.com/.../drug-industry-more-crim...
    Joseph Mercola
    Dec 31, 2011 - Death by Medicine—An Update ... In fact, the drug industry now tops all other industries in the total amount of fraud payments for actions ...
  3. Exposing Pharmaceutical Drug Damages & Drug Deaths to ...

    www.medicinekillsmillions.com/
    Millions of people are affected by Pharmaceutical Drug Damages & Deaths; ... are based on unscientific data … that protect industry and allow the existence of ...
  4. Death by Medicine - 2 - Life ExtensionDeath by Medicine

    www.lef.org/.../mar2004_awsi_death_02.htm
    Life Extension Foundation
    Table 3: Estimated 10-Year Death Rates from Medical Intervention ... to advise on clinical trial research also serve as consultants to the pharmaceutical industry.
  5. "The Drugs Don't Work": How the Medical-Industrial ...

    www.nakedcapitalism.com/.../the-drugs-dont-work-ho...
    Naked Capitalism
    Sep 23, 2012 - They hoodwinked the FDA and the New England Journal of Medicine and took advantage of the public trust which ultimately caused the deaths ...
  6. Medical Error | Avoidable Deaths in the United States

    www.therasim.com/industry-news/medical-error-deaths/
    Apr 9, 2013 - Estimates of the number of deaths attributed to medical errors each year have been varied, but this ... Medical Error in the Health Care Industry ...
  7. [PDF]

    Death by Medicine - webDC.com

    www.webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf
    by G Null - ‎Cited by 38 - ‎Related articles
    researchers have authored a paper titled “Death by Medicine” that presents compelling evidence .... between medical schools and the pharmaceutical industry.
  8. Medical Errors - A leading cause of Death

    www.cancure.org/medical_errors.htm
    This web page is being developed at the request of several people who have been researching problems with the drug industry and conventional medical ...
  9. Big pharma's excuses for the monopolies on medicine won't ...

    www.theguardian.com › OpinionPharmaceuticals industry
    The Guardian
    Feb 22, 2013 - ... South Africa in 2001 at the pharmaceutical industry trying to stop the .... As the UN reports a decline in Aids deaths and HIV infection rates, ...
  10. US HealthCare Industry is the 3rd Leading Cause of Death ...

    www.dailypaul.com › ForumsDaily Paul Liberty Forum
    Daily Paul
    Jan 8, 2011 - 10 posts - ‎9 authors
    This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in the ... Because the healthcare industry, including the FDA, is owned by "Big ...

Friday, May 30, 2014

Censorship and Public Broadcasting

It has been my experience that the left censors and the right lies and censors. Since I switched Bigger Fatter Politics comments to Disqus I Fat Bastardo and my investigative journalists have encountered the usual lying but more troubling than lying is the Nazi style censorship. Privately owned websites can censor and most of them do but government funded sites like those overseen by public broadcasting aka PBS cannot censor but they do. Here is what one group of public radio stations is forbiding:

Your submissions may not infringe upon others' use and enjoyment of the SCPR Web sites.

Do not post any material or links to material that is libelous, defamatory, false, obscene, violent, abusive, threatening, harassing, prejudicial, employing profanity, or is otherwise in violation of the law or SCPR's guidelines. (If you see a violation of this policy in an SCPR discussion space, please report it on our Contact form.)


Nearly everyone of these forbidden criterion is the based on the judgment of some Nazi censor. Let's look at a few example:

Prejudicial: Mohammed was a pedophile. Anyone during anytime who would marry a six year old and begin fucking her when she was 9 is a pedophile but some PBS affiliates won't allow you to say that.  

Profanity: What is profanity? Shit but not poop? Intercourse but not fuck? Penis but not cock? Fellatio but not cock sucking?

Obscene: A priest molested a boy and got away with it or a priest rammed his cock down the throat of a boy and fucked his ass until he bled?

False: Obama is a gay Muslim or John McCain is a liar and a known wife beater?

Violent: We need to kill bin Laden or we need to kill the traitorous criminal elite who kill more innocent people than the terrorists?

Abusive: I respectfully disagree with you statement or you are a lying sack of shit?

Harassing: There are many contradictions in the Bible but I respect your faith or the Bible is a big fucking pack of lies and you are an idiot to believe it.

Your submission may be removed by us at our discretion, for any reason.

We will remove from the site any comment that violates our guidelines. In instances of willful abuse, we reserve the right to take whatever action we determine appropriate, including the termination of access privileges and legal action.


Some time ago Google censored and de indexed Bigger Fatter Blog based on complaints from angry jealous fat girls who hate men and hate the fact that I have proven that fat people gluttons. That is what they found offensive. Finally Google, not wanting to be sued removed the warning on my Bigger Fatter Blog and re-indexed it.

Google is a corporation and they have no obligation to protect freedom of speech and is at liberty to censor what ever they choose. There is no doubt about that. It's different with public broadcasting which is publicly funded.

I will be contacting free speech champion Larry Flint to inform him of this blatant violation of free speech.

It's no secret that the US is no longer a functioning democracy and President Jimmy Carter said as much while Ron Paul called American government corporatism and a mild form of fascism.

I am not the only one concerned about the disturbing censorship trend in public broadcasting.

If you have been a victim of 89.3 KPCC or other public broadcasting censorship please contact them and complain. Report your experience  to the ACLU of Southern California and see if they will file suit against PBS.



  1. Censorship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_United_States
    Wikipedia
    Jump to Broadcast censorship - It can issue fines if, for example, the broadcaster employs ... foul language, and the coarsening of public entertainment in ...
  2. Did Public Television Commit Self-Censorship to Appease ...

    www.democracynow.org/.../did_public_television_co...
    Democracy Now!
    May 30, 2013 - Filmmakers Tia Lessin and Carl Deal say plans for their new documentary to air on public television have been quashed after billionaire ...
  3. Don't Let The Koch Brothers Censor Public Broadcasting!

    act.watchdog.net/petitions/3100
    Citizen Koch," a documentary on how Citizens United has warped American politics, was promised funding by public television, but executives withdrew support ...
  4. Censorship In America - Laws

    censorship.laws.com › ... › Censorship LawsFreedom Of Speech
    Censorship in America is the act of altering, adjusting, editing, or banning of ... A Public Broadcast is defined as a transmission of media through the usage of ...
  5. Don't Censor Public Broadcasting - New York Times

    www.nytimes.com/.../don-t-censor-public-broadcas...
    The New York Times
    Feb 6, 1992 - It's not surprising that the Republican Party's right wing finds public broadcasting "too liberal." Public television and radio reach out to diverse ...
  6. Censorship on public television by the Editors - Jump Cut

    www.ejumpcut.org/archive/.../EdlPublicTVCenshp.html
    Jump Cut
    At the same time, these sources, and the major outlet for film and video, public television, directly and indirectly censor work they disagree with politically.
  7. Did Public Television Commit Self-Censorship to ... - YouTube

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ljSr7cqNKg
    YouTube
    May 30, 2013 - Uploaded by democracynow
    http://www.democracynow.org - Filmmakers Tia Lessin and Carl Deal say plans for their new documentary to air ...
  8. Public Broadcasting Censorship Sparks Fiery Exchange at ...

    nofilmschool.com/2013/.../public-broadcasting-censorship-ifp-film-week...
    Sep 18, 2013 - Directors threw caution to the wind Monday at the IFP 2013 Film Week, engaging in a heated on-stage debate during the “When ...
  9. Jane Mayer: How Far Did PBS Go to Avoid Offending a ...

    www.newyorker.com/.../2013/.../130527fa_fact_mayer...
    The New Yorker
    May 27, 2013 - Public television's attempts to placate David Koch. ... of their new owners, either through executive mandates or through self-censorship.


Obama The Gun Grabber? NOT!

Conservative lying trash have said President Barack Obama is "coming for your guns" and had a "strategy" to get reelected and then "erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights."
But with gun policy again in the news after the Isla Vista shooting, it's worth considering that Obama's legacy on gun control may ultimately be defined by the executive orders he issued in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Conn. And absent any concerted effort by Congress, the fear that encouraged a spike in gun sales after Obama's election and reelection may have all been for naught.
Indeed, the president said after last September's massacre at the Washington Navy Yard that voters should pressure Congress to initiate gun control legislation, since he had already "taken steps that are within my control" after Newtown. In an election year in which Republicans need to pick up only six seats to retake the Senate, the prospects for a push on guns may seem dim to even the most optimistic supporter of reform.
And with that, a list of all the actions Obama has taken on guns. You'll notice he hasn't done much to restrict access:
That time he signed a bill allowing concealed loaded firearms in national parks.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) introduced an amendment in 2009 permitting concealed, loaded guns in national parks to a bill about credit cards, saying differences in state and federal laws inhibited gun owners from travel between state and federal lands.
And signed a bill allowing Amtrak passengers to store handguns in their checked baggage.
Advocates of the bill, also introduced in 2009, said it gave train riders rights comparable to those possessed by plane passengers. Amtrak had allowed firearms to be carried on trains before 9/11, so the bill represented a victory for gun rights activists.
After Newtown, Obama assembled a task force to address gun violence.
Obama charged Vice President Joe Biden in December 2012 with overseeing anadministration-wide process to develop proposals for Congress to take up. He urged lawmakers to reinstate a ban on assault weapons, close loopholes that allow buyers to avoid background checks and restrict high-capacity ammunition clips.
Then unveiled proposals to combat gun violence…
Obama's legislative proposals, released in January 2013, touched upon not just access to firearms and ammunition but school safety and mental health care.
And issued 23 executive actions.
A high point for the the White House on gun control was when Obama announced a flurry of executive actions accompanying his legislative proposals. The actions included requiring federal agencies to hand over relevant data for a background check system, providing more training for responders in shooting situations and restarting research on gun violence.
Only to see Congress take up just one of those proposals... and quickly shoot it down.
Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey's (R-Pa.) legislation on background checks fell short by five votes in April that year, even though nearly 90 percent of Americans favored strengthening such measures. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last month that he'd need more support from senators to revisit the bill.
But he did get to sign a renewal of an existing bill banning plastic firearms.
It appears that all Congress is capable of doing when it comes to gun control isauthorizing an extension of a prohibition against guns that can avoid detection by metal detectors and X-ray machines. Republicans went along with renewing the ban in December, but resisted tightening the restrictions.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Manuel Uribe World's Fattest Man DEAD

A Depressed Uribe Starved Down to a 867 pounds
The fatosphere is reeling from the sudden death of fattest man Manuel Uribe but instead of mourning his death we should be celebrating his life. He was the world's fattest man for fuck sake! THE WORLDS FATTEST MAN! According the an Associated Press report, "Manuel Uribe had slimmed down to about 867 pounds, well below his then-record peak weight of 1,230 pounds, which was certified in 2006 as a Guinness World Record." Well, there's the problem! Why wasn't HAES  (Health At Every Size) used? had he been given ALL the food he wanted instead of starved down to and an emaciated 876 pounds he would be alive today and maybe even competing as an elite Olympic track and field decathlete. 

Uribe was not your average glutton. He was a glutton's glutton. He represented  a glutton and a gluttonous life style that to which all fatlings wish to aspire. Let's break this down. 

Manuel Uribe's Impressive Numbers
  • Resting (basal) metabolic rate: 12,882 calories per day
  • Typical daily activities: 6441 calories per day
  • Total calories burned: 19,324 per day
Simply to maintain his weight of 1230 pounds Uribe had to take in a whopping 19,324 calories a day. HOLY FUCK! To put that into perspective a man with a body weight of 160 pounds only needs 2500 calories to maintain his weight. This means that Uribe ate times as much food as the average man. Do you know how hard that is to do?! Let's put that into perspective and say that Uribe ate Subway low fat foot long subs. He would have to eat a super whopping 39 feet of Subway subs to reach 19,324 calories. That is nearly as tall as a 4 story building! 

No Man is an Island

What is more impressive about Uribe is the way he was able to employ and manipulate his feeding team. Left on his own Uribe would have been unable to obtain food and since he could not work he could not afford to buy food so how did he do it?

In happier times Uribe with his main squeeze and a cheese cake 
Large and in Charge!

Uribe had to muster, command and control a small army of feeders and other caretakers to enable him to live such a glorious fat and gluttonous life style. Originally NAAFA meant (National Association Aiding Fat Americans and shouldn't the proper mission of the fat acceptance movement be enabling fat people to live the fat and gluttonous lifestyle? His troops were faithful and dedicated. Uribe was a natural born leader. While in his four poster command center the majestic Uribe remained in complete charge of his loyal minions. 

The task of procuring all of his favorite dishes was monumental but beyond that the husbandry involved is his toileting alone had to be herculean. This fat hero was shitting more than a elephant. He was shitting constantly and shitting more than 8 regular sized people. Bathing him took a team of skilled and dedicated worshipers as well. 

He Died Young? Well Not Really

Uribe lived 45 years but since he was the size 8 normal people in fat people years he lived 360 years. We gluttons have a saying, It is not the quantity of life but the quality of life. Uribe has to eat constantly to maintain he weight so he was constantly happy content and satisfied. He outlived everyone! He had more happy moments than anyone. He had perpetual happiness until people conspired against him and starved him to death. Yes, you read that right, He was starved to death and here's why... CG Brady explains.

Yes Fat Bastardo, Mr Uribe was indeed starved to death. Uribe was placed on the Zone Diet.  The Zone Diet is a variation on Atkins and South Beach. Uribe was placed on a ridiculously low calorie diet that derived a large portions of calories from fat. As a result Uribe suffered severe liver damage. Uribe's liver was completely depleted of glycogen, the storage form of glucose.

Uribe could have lost the weight safely but that didn't happen is this case. Uribe lost 363 pounds very rabidly. The most weight he should have lost initially was 4 pounds per week. Had he been placed on 13,000 calories a day he would have lost nearly 13 pounds per week. For most people, losing 1 pound per week per 100 pounds of body weight is very safe especially if they get their nutrition right but these doctor endorsed starvation diets are not only cruel but they are dangerous. 

I can't say for certain whether carbohydrate and nutrient starvation was the only cause of Uribe's death but had to have played a role.