Friday, February 13, 2015

Wikipedia Crossed The Line With Their Censorship



I rarely rely on Wikipedia for information but from time to time I read articles there. Several years ago I joined Wikipedia because I came across an article that did a hit job on MeMe Roth of National Action Against Obesity. While I don't agree with Ms Roth I believe her to be a woman of honor. I also believe in the truth. I edited the Wikipedia article by correcting it but my edit was deleted mostly likely by an angry jealous fat girl or some loser with a fat and stinky wife.

I also edited some fat acceptance article by including links to my fat acceptance sites and that is what caused them to block me, Fat Bastardo.

Thanks to my work and the work of MeMe Roth fat acceptance, the nasty man hating science denying kind, may not be dead but is sure smells bad because it is in its final death throes.

To prove a point and to educate the Wikipedia censors about free speech I, Fat Bastardo have started an appeal process. I will probably not be participating with Wikipedia any further. I will leave it to my readers to edit articles. The following is from my appeal.

Why do you believe you should be unblocked?

I think I was blocked for adding my fat acceptance site to an article about Fat Acceptance. My sites are critical to the current fat acceptance movement for its lack of effectiveness, its denial of science and the dangerous information it conveys. Currently the second leading cause of death and injury is obesity/gluttony. The NAAFA style and fat feminist style of fat acceptance hates men especially fat men and they spread dangerous health information. 

In the interest of balance I added my sites Bigger Fatter Blog, NAAFA.blogspot.com and Bigger Fatter Politics but because a male and scientific version of fat acceptance competes with the science denying man hating fat acceptance movement I suspect that some crazies flagged it. When Google placed a warning on Bigger Fatter Blog I was forced to take legal actions against them. They have now removed the warning, reindexed Bigger Fatter Blog and now they no longer remove, place warnings on or de-index blogs based on flaggers.  

If you are unblocked, what articles do you intend to edit?


I don't know at this point. I will be discussing this with an ACLU civil rights attorney before I do anything. I think an apology from wikipedia is in order

Why do you think there is a block currently affecting you? If you believe it's in error, tell us how.

I explained that in the first comment box. It was in error because people with an agenda who did not like my politics of sanity influenced the admin or moderator who blocked me. A few years I made another edit regarding anti-obesity advocate MeMe Roth. I tried to correct some inaccurate and libelous information posted by her enemies (jealous angry man hating fat girls). That probably also got me in Dutch with your censors. Despite the fact that Ms Roth and I are on opposite sides of the issue I defended her and the truth and in spite of that my edit was deleted so I never bothered to repeat it. Clearly some at wikipedia has a pro angry fat girl, anti science, man hating, anti health, slender woman hating agenda.

Is there anything else you would like us to consider when reviewing your block?

When you guys start censoring and bowing to political correctness you end up on a slippery slope. Unpopular speech is the only speech that requires protection. I hope that fact sinks in. My work in the field of fat acceptance and the obesity crisis is important. People are dying and it is mostly due to ignorance and the nutritional misinformation. Wikipedia is helping to perpetuate this dangerous health misinformation by denying my sites being included in your articles. The co-morbidities of obesity will kill at least 500,000 Americans each year and maim millions more while putting $100's of billions into the coffers of the corrupt American medical industry. Wikipedia's censorship helping that process.

FOR MORE EXAMPLES OF WIKIPEDIA CENSORSHIP CLICK HERE

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Pasco Cops Kill Rock Throwing Suspect



Antonio Zambrano-Montez was gunned down by Pasco police for allegedly throwing rocks at them. While fleeing from the police and and turning around with his hands up police fired what sounds like 15 shots into the unarmed fleeing suspect.

In typical cops style Pasco Gestapo kill a man trying to surrender. Ryan Flanagan, Adam Wright,  and Alaniz gun execute a fleeing then surrendering Antonio Zambrano-Montez.

If Israeli solders killed rock hurling Palestinians the whole would would be talking shit about Israel but it seems that in terrorists are treated with more respect than Americans.





Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Adolf Hitler The Model Republican



More evil than Hitler were his followers and more evil than a Republican are the Republican voters. It may surprise you to know that Hitler was not antisemitic but his supporters were. They were what put him into power. Like a Republican Hitler rarely said what he believed and like most Republicans, Hitler had no core. All Hitler had was the hate of a whole fucking lot of scumbags and clever lies that they found delicious.


On Wednesday, the New York Times reached deep in its own archives — back to November 21, 1922, and dredged up the first article it ever published about Adolf Hitler. It's an incredible read — especially its assertion that "Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so violent or genuine as it sounded."
Times correspondent Cyril Brown spends most of the piece documenting the factors behind Hitler's early rise in Bavaria, Germany, including his oratorical skills, for example: "he exerts an uncanny control over audiences, possessing the remarkable ability to not only rouse his hearers to a fighting pitch of fury, but at will turn right around and reduce the same audience to docile coolness."
But the really extraordinary part of the article is the three paragraphs on anti-Semitism. Brown acknowledges Hitler's vicious anti-Semitism as the core of Hitler's appeal — and notes the terrified Jewish community was fleeing from him — but goes on to dismiss it as a play to satiate the rubes (bolding mine):
He is credibly credited with being actuated by lofty, unselfish patriotism. He probably does not know himself just what he wants to accomplish. The keynote of his propaganda in speaking and writing is violent anti-Semitism. His followers are nicknamed the "Hakenkreuzler." So violent are Hitler's fulminations against the Jews that a number of prominent Jewish citizens are reported to have sought safe asylums in the Bavarian highlands, easily reached by fast motor cars, whence they could hurry their women and children when forewarned of an anti-Semitic St. Bartholomew's night.
But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.
A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: "You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them."
Now, Brown's sources in all likelihood did tell him that Hitler's anti-Semitism was for show. That was a popular opinion during Nazism's early days. But that speaks to how unprepared the world was for a movement as sincerely, radically violent as Hitler's to take power in one of its more important countries.
One other thing: if "violent anti-Semitism" was such a winning issue for Hitler, what does that tell us about the state of public opinion in Bavaria in 1922?

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Doctors Suck



Just a quick reminder. Doctors suck and when it comes to doctors that suck the most it is American doctors. Here are some links explaining some of the reason who the members of the  White Coat Mafia suck so much.



Ones Man's Explanation of Why American Doctors Suck and Should be Put in Cages" CLICK HERE

Sucky American MDs Are As Common As Cockroaches CLICK HERE

Why American Doctors Are Arrogant Assholes CLICK HERE

Why Doctors Are Arrogant Pricks CLICK HERE

Why American MDs Are Arrogant Scum CLICK HERE

Excerpt:

A Large Ego Is a Cover Up

Psychologists will tell you that when someone who acts arrogant or superior, does so because he lacks self-confidence. Instead of truly feeling superior, he instead, truly feels inferior. So he'll use intimidation, or act conceited to cover up that lack of self-esteem. In the school yard, this doctor was a bully. In a medical setting, that bully's intimidation takes the form of arrogance.
Doctors spend a lifetime with their personalities and you won't be able to change it. Therefore, your choices are to either learn to work around it, or to find another doctor or kick him in the balls.

The fact is American MDs are arrogant, ignorant, greedy, unethical and above all dangerous. If fact medical errors alone kill 440,000 Americans each and every year. To put this into perspective; There are 80 million gun owners in America and 32,000 gun deaths and 1/2 of those deaths are suicides. There are 700,000 MDs in American and they and their industry kill over 1 million people each year and they maim millions more.

Related: Filthy Criminal Big Pharma

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Marketing to Doctors (HBO)


More Arrogant Doctors From The Internet 


  1. Why are doctors so arrogant? - Yahoo Answers

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid...

    Mar 24, 2009 - I don't know. I've yet to meet a doctor that didn't think the world of him or herself.
  2. Arrogance among physicians.

    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/...

    National Center for Biotechnology Information
    by AS Berger - ‎2002 - ‎Cited by 24 - ‎Related articles
    Arrogance among physicians is, regrettably, common and violates the ... the doctor-patient relationship and created a kind of "system arrogance" in which the ...
  3. Tips for Talking to Arrogant Doctors | Howard J. Bennett, M.D.

    www.huffingtonpost.com/.../doctor-patient-relations...

    The Huffington Post
    Nov 9, 2012 - I know as well as anyone how many demands doctors face. We feel pressure to be on time, get a detailed medical history and not make ...
  4. Arrogant, Abusive and Disruptive — and a Doctor - NYTimes ...

    www.nytimes.com/2008/12/02/.../02rage.html?...all

    The New York Times
    Dec 1, 2008 - Recent studies suggest that badly behaved doctors contribute to medical mistakes, preventable complications and even death.
  5. Proof: Doctors are stupid, lazy, arrogant, greedy, overpaid ...

    https://plus.google.com/.../posts/ZKd2vqYWYjY

    Fat Bastardo - Shared privately
    Apr 18, 2013 - Proof: Doctors are stupid, lazy, arrogant, greedy, overpaid, liars criminals

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Vaccine Facts

Memorial Day is for remembering those, who have fought and died to defend America and preserve our civil liberties, including freedom of thought, speech, religious belief and conscience. So every Memorial Day I remember the children, who have died after receiving state mandated vaccines, and honor their mothers and fathers, who grieve for them.

Death Has Always Been A Vaccine Complication
From the first human vaccines developed two centuries ago, smallpox and rabies vaccines, death has always been a complication of vaccination.1 2  In 1933, the whole cell pertussis vaccine’s ability to kill without warning was first reported in the medical literature when two infants died within minutes of a pertussis shot.3 In 1946, American doctors detailed the sudden deaths of twins within 24 hours of their second diphtheria-pertussis shot.4 In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and has awarded over $2 billion dollars in compensation for deaths and injuries caused by vaccines.5 


U.S. Infant Mortality Rate High
According to the most recent National Vital Statistics Report, more than 26,000 American babies born alive in 2009 died before their first birthday, which gives the U.S. a very high infant mortality rate of 6 infant deaths per 1,000 live births.6  In 1960, America ranked 12th in infant mortality among all nations of the world. In 2005, we had fallen to number 30. Today in America, there are more premature babies than ever before and more full term babies die before their first birthday than in most European countries.7  

Some people argue that not every country calculates their infant mortality statistics the same way, which artificially inflates the poor ranking for the U.S.8 Even if adjustments would boost the U.S. ranking up several notches, there can be no question that a nation, which spends more per capita on healthcare 9 and legally requires their children to get more vaccines than any other country, should have one of the best – not one of the worst – infant mortality rates, especially for healthy babies born full term. 

New Study: More Vaccines = Higher Infant Mortality Rate
Now there is a new study published in a peer reviewed medical journal that NVIC has helped to make publicly accessible to everyone, which reveals that developed nations with poor infant mortality rates, like the U.S., tend to give their infants more doses of vaccines before age one.10 The study’s authors found “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing numbers of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.” To put this into perspective, doctors give American babies 26 doses of vaccines before age one, which is twice as many vaccinations as babies in Sweden and Japan get.
Is it really just a “coincidence” that the infant mortality rate is twice as high in America compared to Sweden and Japan, where half as many vaccinations are given to very young babies?
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome & Vaccination

A mother and father’s worst nightmare is to watch their baby die before reaching their first birthday. When a healthy baby dies unexpectedly shortly after routine vaccinations, often parents ask legitimate questions about whether the vaccines did it. They are usually met with quick denials by doctors and public health officials anxious to defend the safety of vaccines.
The death certificates of many babies, who die shortly after vaccination, list Sudden Infant Death Syndrome or SIDS as the cause of death, which means that no specific symptoms or other reason for death could be found.11 That was true in the 1980s, when I was interviewing parents of babies, who died suddenly after DPT shots, for the 1985 book DPT: A Shot in the Dark,12 which Dr. Harris Coulter and I wrote at a time when SIDS – a newly created medical term - was becoming the leading cause of infant mortality in the U.S 13 

Vaccine Deaths Described in 1985 Book
What I found and detailed in our book is that most babies dying after DPT shots were not found dead in their cribs without any symptoms before they died. They were dying after suffering plenty of vaccine reaction symptoms within days of their DPT shot, symptoms like high fever; sudden collapse; hours of persistent crying or high pitched screaming with arching of the back that can be a sign of brain inflammation; severe diarrhea; redness, swelling and pain at the injection site and signs of seizures that too many pediatricians were blowing off as unimportant. Other babies, who received several DPT shots, were described by their mothers as suffering a progressive mental and physical deterioration that got worse after each shot before the baby was found dead in the crib.

Inconvenient Truth: More Full Term Babies Dying in America
Several studies in the 1980s showed an association between infant death and DPT vaccinations.14 15  Today, it is thought that genetic and environmental risk factors combine to leave SIDS babies with signs of petechial hemorrhages, lung congestion and brainstem and neurotransmitter dysfunction.16  Most doctors continue to deny that vaccination is a risk factor for SIDS17  and say that SIDS has declined since pediatricians launched a national campaign in the 1990s to put babies on their backs to sleep,18 but others point out that the only reason SIDS death statistics have gone down is because, today, fewer infant deaths are labeled “SIDS” by doctors and coroners.19 

The inconvenient truth remains that the numbers of pre-term births continues to increase in America and there are more full-term babies dying before their first birthday than in most developed nations of the world. 20 


Half of U.S. Children Chronically Ill
Health officials have no explanation for this horrible child death statistic. They also have no explanation for the fact that, today, an estimated 43 to 54 percent of all American children suffer with at least one chronic illness requiring health insurance reimbursement, including a staggering 26 percent of children under age six years at high risk for developmental, social or behavioral delays.21  Government officials now admit that, In the past decade, developmental disabilities among American children has increased by a whopping 17 percent and is led by a rise in autism and ADHD.22 23 

American Children Used To Be Healthier
This is not the way it used to be in America when I was growing up in the 1950s and early 1960s. Back then, women were not getting vaccinated during pregnancy 24 and there were only a few vaccines given to babies25 and there were few children suffering with learning disabilities, ADHD, autism, asthma and severe allergies,26 27  diabetes,28 29  bi-polar disorders30  and taking a cocktail of prescription medications.31 And the U.S. was ranked number 12 among all nations in infant mortality, not near the bottom of the list.

Child Health Report Card: F
This is not a very good health report card for a nation that, in the last 50 years, has paid tens of trillions of dollars to the pharmaceutical industry, public health agencies and pediatricians telling us to trust their advice about how to keep our children healthy. More health insurance and more “medical homes” will not turn F’s into A’s on that bad health report card.

May 1986: Parents Reported Vaccine Infant Deaths to CDC
Exactly 25 years ago, in May 1986, I joined with mothers and fathers, whose babies died after DPT shots, and gave a presentation to the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta. We told physician members of the CDC’s vaccine policymaking committee, who wanted state legislators to strictly enforce laws legally requiring children to get 23 doses of 7 vaccines starting at two months through age six, that doctors did not really know how many children were dying after vaccination. You can read the transcript of that 1986 CDC meeting32  on NVIC’s website and decide for yourself whether anything has really changed in 25 years except the fact that, now, public health officials are ordering doctors to give children 48 doses of 14 vaccines starting on day of birth through age six, with half of those doses given before age one.

On NVIC’s website at NVIC.org, you can also visit the virtual International Memorial for Vaccine Victims to read about or post a description of a vaccine-related death;33  you can research and read descriptions of deaths following vaccination made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System;34  and you can learn more about vaccine reactions so, if your pediatrician does not educate you, you will be armed with that life saving information.35 

Vaccine Safety Assumptions Are Dangerous
A death is a death, no matter what the cause. Every death that occurs after vaccination cannot be automatically presumed to be causally related to the vaccines recently given. However, to assume that all or most infant deaths, which occur within hours, days or weeks after vaccination, are just a “coincidence” and not related to vaccination is both scientifically implausible and dangerous.
It is especially dangerous for individual families, as well as for our entire population, to make assumptions about vaccine safety in a vacuum of knowledge. When high infant mortality rates in America correspond with the high numbers of vaccines babies are being given in the first year of life, credible investigation into the child death and chronic disease epidemic should be our highest national priority and vaccination should not be left off the table.
We must remember these children.

Click here to read the new study by Miller & Goldman: Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Click here to order the book A Shot in the Dark by Coulter & Fisher. 
Click here to read a partial transcript of the May 12, 1986 Meeting at the CDC.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

The Medical Mafia and FDA Corruption

New Harvard study reveals Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and how FDA cannot be trusted with public safety

A new article with title of “Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs" is set to be published in the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (JLME). The article written by Prof. Donald W. Light, Joel Lexchin, and Jonathan J. Darrow present evidence that about 90% of all new drugs approved by FDA over the last 30 years have little or no advantages compared to the existing drugs.
The article points out how FDA who supposedly must be in charge of public health and safety is nothing more than a puppet run by giant pharmaceutical companies. The fact is that the medical industry has become a leading cause of death and just in US, annually, 12,000 people die due to unnecessary surgeries, 7,000 people die due to medical errors, 20,000 people die due to other errors, 80,000 people die from infections acquired at the hospitals and 106,000 people die from adverse side effect of medications.  
FDA-Big-Pharma-Harvard-drugs

According to Harvard report, in US alone, every week, about 53,000 people end up in hospitals and 2400 people die as a result of taking prescription drugs:

The Harvard report points out how one in five drugs approved by FDA seriously harm people and prescription drugs are becoming the 4th leading cause of death. There are also other related issues with drugs such as hospitalizations from over-dosing, errors, or recreational drug use and about 80 million people a year suffer from mild side effects of drugs like insomnia, dizziness, aches and digestive problems.
The forthcoming article in JLME also shows that the pharmaceutical industry makes large contribution to FDA for reviewing its drugs and also contributes large campaign donations to US Congress in order to pass legislation that would benefit the giant Pharmaceuticals. According to the authors “Congress has underfunded FDA enforcement capacities since 1906, and turning to industry-paid “user fees” since 1992 has biased funding to limit the FDA’s ability to protect the public from serious adverse reactions to drugs that have few offsetting advantages”.

Biotech, Pharmaceutical and chemical companies spend more money selling and promoting a product or a drug rather than scientific research and studies about the safety of their products:

With FDA’s incompetence and failure to take a stand and act based on public's interests and safety, consumers and patients are now turning into innocent victims in mercy of giant biotech, chemical and pharmaceutical companies. In fact, in order to get FDA’s approval and buy public trust, the giant pharmaceuticals fund a team of doctors and researchers to publish a literature in one of the scientific journals to hide the drug’s side effect and overstate its benefits.
On the other hand, FDA who gets paid by giant pharmaceuticals spare no efforts to perform any independent studies of its own and totally relies on the information that’s presented to them by giant pharmaceuticals or biotech companies.  Since such corrupted knowledge is approved and regulated by FDA, even sometimes good physicians recommend these toxic drugs or products to their patients.
institutional-corruption-of-pharmaceuticals-how-FDA-cannot-be-trusted

Giant Pharmaceuticals, biotech (Monsanto and DuPont), and chemical companies (Dow, Bayer, and ExxonMobil) are growing even bigger under the protection of FDA:

According to Harvard article, “The New England Journal of Medicine has published, without comment, proposals by two senior figures from the FDA to loosen criteria drugs that allege to prevent Alzheimer’s disease by treating it at an early stage. First, they use the word “disease” to refer to a hypothetical “early-stage Alzheimer’s disease” that supposedly exists “before the earliest symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease are apparent.” The proposed looser criteria would legitimate drugs as “safe and effective” that have little or no evidence of being effective and expose millions to risks of harmful side effects”.

How conflict of interest has become a defining problem in the modern science:

Not long ago, Monsanto’s former researcher, Richard Goodman was chosen in position of the associate editor of the journal for biotechnology after the famous Séralini study showed huge tumors in rats as a result of Monsanto’s GM maize and Roundup. The biotech companies have unleashed genetically modified organisms that have been linked to a wide range of diseases including cancer, birth defects, gluten diseases and allergies in our food supply.
Two major GMO labeling movements, both in Washington and California were defeated since the junk food, biotech and chemical companies poured millions of dollars to defeat a label GMO labeling: http://www.seattleorganicrestaurants.com/vegan-whole-food/biotech-chemical-corporations-spent-millions-to-defeat-Washington-GMO-labeling-initiative.php
These days, majority of big donations to our schools and universities come from giant Pharmaceutical, biotech, chemical and oil companies. You would think that at least the academic research are non-biased and natural, considering that our government is deeply in bed with giant oil, drug, biotech, chemical and pharmaceutical companies.
The question is that are we that naive to think that billions of dollars of contributions from these giant companies (who are polluting our food, air and environment), won’t tilt or at least steer the findings of these so called ‘scientific studies?’  
Resources:
- See more at: http://seattleorganicrestaurants.com/vegan-whole-food/institutional-corruption-of-pharmaceuticals-how-FDA-cannot-be-trusted-with-public-safety.php#sthash.A1YiGzIz.dpuf

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Obama VS Putin

Related image
That's right Vlad, I won't sell out America you pathetic closet  t-Rump ranger.


The treasonous Republicans love Putin.

Image result for trump putin
TP for America's bung hole

Most male Republicans have a full blown gay man crush on Putin.

Why do they love Putin so much and hate Obama? Why to they want to see Putin win and Obama lose? Here's why. Putin is their kind of people. Putin is a war monger and a and Republicans love war. Putin has wrecked his own country's economy and Republican love seeing people in poverty and they hate prosperity. Putin is a thug and most Republicans are thugs. Putin is closet homosexual and so are many Republicans.

Image result for Republicans putin

Image result for Republicans putin
Why do the boy buggering Republicans hate Obama?

The US economic recovery under Obama's leadership has outpaced the economic recovery of every other Western country. Republicans hate prosperity and they hate Obama.

Obama ends wars. Republicans are chicken hawks who love war. Obama ends wars and they hate him for that. War is very profitable.

Obama is not gay and Republicans hate that. Sure they would hate him if he were gay and they so badly want him to be gay and that is why start rumors saying that he's gay. They even go so far as to say Michelle Obama is really a man.



Obama has made Putin his bitch. Republicans love being somebody's bitch and that is why they are the bitches of the banks and corporations.

Related image

Image result for Republicans putin

Image result for Republicans putin
Rudy you are what patriots call an asshole and a traitor.