FAT HATE BONANZA!

Even Hoss Cartwright is Pissed

FAT HATE BONANZA! by Chuck Roast

I really had some apprehension about posting this hateful garbage that I found online on a message board. I will not post the addy of the site because I don't want to give them any free publicity but let it suffice to say this was on a fitness site. We all know how cruel those roid monkeys can be.

I am still so flabbergasted at the cruel mockery of these lovely BBW's that I remain at a loss for words. Perhaps Teddy and Fat Bastard can talk me down but right now because I am livid!!! I will add more editorial comments regarding this smudge on fat people and the movement. So watch for this article to change. I am sure Fat Bastard will want to add his outrage to this abomination.

Upon further reflection and a good talking down from Teddy Bear, I have regained my composure. I have spoken with Fat Bastard he reminded me that no one ever rushes to a fat man's defense the way I rushed to the defense of these much maligned ladies. Fat men have feelings too and they also suffer the cruel ridicule persecution that fat women suffer. I suppose if a bunch of skinny skanks like Me Me Roth and her band of fat haters started a similar thread about fat men people would laugh and think it was OK.

For Men Only (this is serious man stuff)

I am sure some of you put on the beer googles and porked a fatty. Luckily I got married before most women got fat. I have porked a few voluptuous babes but I have never porked a pig but I bet some of you younger guys have. As men, we all have a minimum standard. Clearly minimum standards have declined given the obesity crisis. Lots of standards have declined because of the obesity crisis.

When it comes to women and sex, what is your minimum standard? In other words how fat does she have to be to make Mr Happy recoil and shrivel up out of fear?

Pick the ones you would do. Then pick the ones you would need beer goggles for. Then pick the ones you would do for a million bucks. Then pick the ones you would rather die than pork.


 Slendarina Hotters 


 Barbie Bonable OOO Yeah!


Patty Perhaps I'd hit that.

Chubberella


Brenda Buffet


Gormanda Sealpup


Maida Ham

Fatty Baluca

Panni Pannicula



Largina Crush

Rotunda Hindenberg

Orca Porka Is this male or female? I can't tell!



Dora Doritos She has an extra body part!

  HOLY SHIT! 





  

Antibiotic Resistance Poses 'Catastrophic Threat'

 

If you are still dumb enough to have weight loss surgery your odds of dying within the first 30 days may now be greater than the usual one in 50. For decades idiot doctors have been overprescribing antibiotics as a result more and more people are dying from a antibiotic resistant bacteria. The surgical site infection rate in the US is 20% growth surgeries but it's much higher for gastric bypass. So when the greedy idiot surgeon with his idiot procedure mangles your intestines and stomach and causes leaks you are now much greater risk that the antibiotics they give you will not work. You will suffer an agonizing death and then you will die.

This is just one more reason for why should never have any form of weight loss surgery and especially any form of gastric bypass.  



So you big fat cowardly idiot glutton, what are you going to do now, be a weak willed glutton and rely on some greedy bastard doing a barbaric procedure on you or you going to screw up the courage and find little ambition to feed yourself in a responsible manner? OR accept your fat, embrace and eat like the pig you are and die happy?

Deadly MRSA Infection being treated with maggots!

Antibiotic Resistance Poses 'Catastrophic Threat' To Medicine, Says Britain's Top Health Official

Reuters  |  By Kate Kelland  Posted: 03/10/2013 11:10 pm EDT  |  Updated: 03/11/2013 9:47 am EDT

By Kate Kelland

LONDON, March 11 (Reuters) - Antibiotic resistance poses a catastrophic threat to medicine and could mean patients having minor surgery risk dying from infections that can no longer be treated, Britain's top health official said on Monday.

Sally Davies, the chief medical officer for England, said global action is needed to fight antibiotic, or antimicrobial, resistance and fill a drug "discovery void" by researching and developing new medicines to treat emerging, mutating infections.

Only a handful of new antibiotics have been developed and brought to market in the past few decades, and it is a race against time to find more, as bacterial infections increasingly evolve into "superbugs" resistant to existing drugs.

"Antimicrobial resistance poses a catastrophic threat. If we don't act now, any one of us could go into hospital for minor surgery and die because of an ordinary infection that can't be treated by antibiotics," Davies told reporters as she published a report on infectious disease.

"And routine operations like hip replacements or organ transplants could be deadly because of the risk of infection."

One of the best known superbugs, MRSA, is alone estimated to kill around 19,000 people every year in the United States - far more than HIV and AIDS - and a similar number in Europe.


And others are spreading. Cases of totally drug resistant tuberculosis have appeared in recent years and a new wave of "super superbugs" with a mutation called NDM 1, which first emerged in India, has now turned up all over the world, from Britain to New Zealand.

Last year the WHO said untreatable superbug strains of gonorrhoea were spreading across the world.

Laura Piddock, a professor of microbiology at Birmingham University and director of the campaign group Antibiotic Action, welcomed Davies' efforts to raise awareness of the problem.

"There are an increasing number of infections for which there are virtually no therapeutic options, and we desperately need new discovery, research and development," she said.

Davies called on governments and organisations across the world, including the World Health Organisation and the G8, to take the threat seriously and work to encourage more innovation and investment into the development of antibiotics.



"Over the past two decades there has been a discovery void around antibiotics, meaning diseases have evolved faster than the drugs to treat them," she said.

Davies called for more cooperation between the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries to preserve the existing arsenal of antibiotics, and more focus on developing new ones.

Increasing surveillance to keep track of drug-resistant superbugs, prescribing fewer antibiotics and making sure they are only prescribed when needed, and ensuring better hygiene to keep infections to a minimum were equally important, she said.

Nigel Brown, president of the Society for General Microbiology, agreed the issues demanded urgent action and said its members would work hard to better understand infectious diseases, reduce transmission of antibiotic resistance, and help develop new antibiotics.

"The techniques of microbiology and new developments such as synthetic biology will be crucial in achieving this," he said. (Editing by Jason Webb)






The same greedy medical industry that has a vested interest in making people obese also have a vested interest in making them sick so that they can develop new and expensive antibiotics.

Medicare Revises Obesity Coverage Policy

Policy opens door to coverage of anti-obesity interventions

Surgeons preparing freshly removed pannus for the grill!

A simple revision to a government policy manual may at last make it possible for seniors and disabled       

Americans to have treatments for  diseases related to obesity covered under Medicare.

The revised policy announced by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) removes language in the Medicare Coverage Issues Manual stating that obesity is not an illness. This step allows members of the public to request that Medicare review medical evidence to determine whether specific treatments related to obesity would be covered by Medicare.

Another perfectly healthy pannus is removed and soaked in marinade and readied for the BBQ pit. YUM!

"Obesity is a critical public health problem in our country that causes millions of Americans to suffer unnecessary health problems and to die prematurely. Treating obesity-related illnesses and complications adds billions of dollars to the nation's health care costs," said HHS Secretary Thompson during testimony before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education. "With this new policy, Medicare will be able to review scientific evidence in order to determine which interventions improve health outcomes for seniors and disabled Americans who are obese and its many associated medical conditions."

Also called a meat skirt, will greedy surgeons be lopping these extra body parts off and serving them at dinner as meat skirt steaks?

By law, Medicare covers specified medically necessary services for illness and injury. The prior manual language, because it stated that obesity was not an illness, could prevent Medicare from covering treatments for diseases related to obesity.

"From the standpoint of Medicare coverage and the health of our beneficiaries, the question isn't whether obesity is a disease or a risk factor. What matters is whether there's scientific evidence that an obesity-related medical treatment improves health," said CMS Administrator Mark McClellan, M.D., Ph.D. "This change in Medicare's coverage policy puts the focus on public health. The medical science will now determine whether we provide coverage for the treatments that reduce complications and improve quality of life for the millions of Medicare beneficiaries who are obese."

The new policy is not expected to have an immediate impact on Medicare coverage. It does not affect the existing Medicare coverage of treatments of diseases resulting in or made worse by obesity, in particular currently covered surgical treatments for morbidly obese individuals.

However, as requests for coverage of obesity treatments are made by the public, Medicare will implement timely review of the scientific evidence, using the coverage determination procedures established in 1999 and modified by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. Detailed information on this process can be found on the Medicare coverage Web sitewww.cms.gov/coverage. Essential to this process is the submission of published, clinical trial data that demonstrate that obesity-related treatments improve the health of Medicare beneficiaries.

"We encourage and we're expecting requests to review scientific evidence evaluating the benefits of a range of treatments for obesity in the Medicare population," said CMS Chief Medical Officer Sean Tunis, M.D. "As a first step, we expect to convene our Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee in the fall to evaluate the evidence on obesity-related surgical procedures that may reduce the risk of heart disease and other illnesses."

More information about this major Medicare policy revision can be found athttp://www.cms.hhs.gov/ncdr/searchdisplay.asp?id=57

Dietetic Association Hails New Medicare Obesity Policy

More on Medicare

• Medicare Primer
• When Medicare Won't Pay, Appeal
• Medicare Drug Card Prices Beat Internet & Mail-order

More on Obesity

• Big Brother, Thinner Brother
• Obesity, Diabetes on the Increase in US
• 64 Percent of Americans are Overweight

Related Articles

• Medicare and Obesity - Medicare Coverage of Obesity Treatment
• Dietetic Association Hails New Medicare Obesity Policy
• US Government Info, - Articles
• Medicare Coverage - Review of Booklet About Medicare Coverage
• Treatment Insurance Coverage Falls Short

I Fat Bastard am stumped on this one. As our millions of readers know Bigger Fatter Politics is weight loss diet neutral but this smacks of weight loss surgery and we are four square meals plus a few snacks against it. I would encourage our readers to provide their opinions and insight on this. I will also be contacting Coach Gains, Dr Gerald "Teddy" Bear, Former Dean of Feederism Proud FA, The Chef, and our investigative reporter Belly Boy to get to the bottom of this and let us know that it means for fatlings everywhere.