Thursday, January 21, 2016

Palin Family Values Are Republican Values

Claims her woman beating son has PTSD. Gives him access to guns anyway. - Claims Son has PTSD Allows him access to guns anyway

Claims her woman beating son has PTSD. Gives him access to guns anyway. - Claim: My son Track has PTSD Gave him access to guns anyway Blames Obama Track Palin


Track Palin is Sarah Palin's son, known for getting into trouble. Track was an Army Reservist and performed a tour of duty in Iraq in 2008, receiving the accolades of his commanding officer as a good soldier. [+] Track's childhood friend Jeremy Morlock was sentenced to 25 years in prison for murdering unarmed Afghan civilians and taking photos with the corpses as if he was hunting (an incident known as the "Maywand Murders"). [+]


In 2012, Track married a woman named Britta, who gave birth 3 months after the wedding. They were divorced after 18 months, with Track keeping all of the guns and Britta getting full custody of the Baby. [+]

In a 2014 drunken Palin family brawl, Track was the most injured, suffering a bloody mouth and injured elbow. [+]  In 2016, hours after Sarah Palin endorsed Donald Trump for President, Track was arrested for drunken assault of a woman in Alaska. It seems to have been a case of domestic violence. Track also brandished an AR-15 assault rifle when cops showed up. Had Track been Black the cops would have killed him and the shooting would have been justified. Track Palin is an angry and violent drunk. He should have been killed on the spot. 


Bristol Palin

Bristol Palin is Sarah Palin's trampy hypocrite of a daughter who has also been involved in drunken violent brawls. Bristol has also been knocked up twice. I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.Palin has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars as an abstinence-only advocate. 

This depravity does not stop with the Palins. Both Jenna and Barbara Bush have been arrested and Jeb's kids are even worse.





























UPDATE: Track Palin was NOT a Combat Vet

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

I'm With Stupid: Daily News Headline

There is a new way to spell depravity and it's R E P U B L I C AN. Half term governor Sarah Palin has just endorsed Donald Trump. As we know all of Jeb and George W Bush's kids have been arrested, Rand Paul's son was arrested twice, Ben Carson broke the law and violated the Hippocratic oath in his dealings with Mannatech, Ted Cruz took illegal money from Goldman Sachs. As you can see Republicans are quite depraved and lawless and their base is even worse.


Sarah Palin's endorsement of Donald Trump is interesting. Sarah's daughter Bristol has managed to get herself knocked up twice and now we find out Sarah Palin's son arrested for domestic violence at Alaska home.  More depravity from Republicans rears it's ugly head. I must ask what the Daily News headline really means. Does it mean that Trump is stupid for accepting and endorsement from a depraved slut like Sarah Palin? We all know that Sarah Palin in dumber than a box of rocks so does it mean that Trump is with "stupid"? I think it means that the both are stupid. Palin is just stupid and Trump is stupid for excepting her endorsement. Is he really stupid for accepting her endorsement? I think not because there is one thing even more stupid and more depraved than Sarah Palin and that is the Republican voter.


Cercivore Clincal Trial Crimes At Stryker Medical

 There is an attempt to keep this out of mainstream media.. Please get this article out everywhere you can post it.

When it comes to crime corporate crime outpaces street crime by a country mile and when it comes to corporate crime one generally thinks of the financial industry. While financial industry crime is rampant it pales in comparison to medical industry crime. If they were giving out Olympic medals for corporate crime the medical industry would win the gold, silver and bronze. Generally when one thinks about medical crime they think about, billing fraud and big pharma bribing the FDA. As serious as those crimes are we mustn't forget the medical device industry and perhaps the biggest gangster in the medical industry is Stryker Medical. Stryker has committed many criminal acts but one of their most egregious that cause the most grievous injuries was the illegal Cervicore clinical trial in which while colluding with the FDA Stryker knowingly implanted the the dangerous Cervicore into the cervical spines of 250 test subjects many of whom are dying slow and agonizing deaths from metal poisoning. Sadly for these victims, because  this is considered a experimental device no other surgeon has the courage to remove it for fear of reprisals from the goon squads or golden handcuffs at Stryker Medical.

I think what worries the gang at Stryker is not criminal fines or a lawsuit. Corporate gangsters buy their way out of prison all the time but in this case I suspect that the criminals at Stryker are worried about criminal prosecution because lawyers for the victims have strong evidence that Stryker and it clinical investigators were aware that the Cervicore disk implant had not received approval as an experimental device.

Stryker Medical's Long And Bloody History Of Criminal Misconduct




    Otismed Corporation And Former CEO Plead Guilty To ...

    www.justice.gov/.../otismed-corporati...

    United States Department of Justice
    Dec 8, 2014 - Corporation to Pay More than $80 Million to Resolve Criminal and Civil... criminal conduct, and was later acquired by Stryker Corp., a medical  ...

    Stryker Gets Non Prosecution Agreement in FDA Criminal ...

    www.corporatecrimereporter.com/.../stryker-gets-non-prosecution-agree...

    Dec 8, 2014 - Stryker Gets Non Prosecution Agreement in FDA Criminal Case ...Stryker, OtisMed's parent corporation, cooperated with the government with  ...

    Former head of Stryker Corp. subsidiary pleads guilty to fraud

    www.northjersey.com/.../former-head-of-stryker-corp-subsid...

    The Record
    Dec 8, 2014 - The former head of a Stryker Corp. subsidiary pleaded guilty Monday to ... was bought by Stryker, the medical device maker, in 2009, after the fraudulent ...Stryker's OtisMed unit agreed to pay $80 million in criminal and civil  ...

    Bigger Fatter Politics: Stryker Medical Crimes

    biggerfatterpolitics.blogspot.com/2015/08/stryker-medical-crimes.html

    Aug 20, 2015 - Stryker Spine Faces More Lawsuits. Stryker Corp. (NYSE:SYK) is fielding legal challenges on two fronts, one from a former distributor and ...

    June 26, 2015: Former OtisMed CEO Sentenced for Selling ...

    www.fda.gov/.../CriminalInvestigations/uc...

    Food and Drug Administration
    Jun 26, 2015 - The former president and CEO of OtisMed Corporation was ... Strykeracquired the company after the criminal conduct for which he was  ...

    Former CEO of Stryker subsidiary sentenced to two years in ...

    www.modernhealthcare.com › ... › Medical Devices

    Modern Healthcare
    Jun 26, 2015 - A former CEO of a Stryker Corp. subsidiary was sentenced to two years in ... and that OtisMed's criminal conduct happened before Stryker acquired it and without Stryker's knowledge. ... Tags: Medical Devices, Technology  ...

    Stryker faces major fines over a subsidiary's past ...

    www.modernhealthcare.com › ... › Medical Devices

    Modern Healthcare
    Dec 8, 2014 - Stryker Corp. is facing stiff penalties, including $80 million in fines and ...that OtisMed's criminal conduct 'occurred prior to Stryker's acquisition of ... led to believe by the FDA that the devices were Class 1 medical devices that  ...

    Stryker Biotech spars with prosecutors over criminal charges ...

    medcitynews.com/.../stryker-biotech-spars-with-prosecutors-over-crimin...

    Nov 12, 2010 - The indictment also charges that Stryker and Philip lied to the FDA about the ... the government agency that regulated Stryker Biotech's medical ...

    Pharmaceutical Criminal Liability: Continuing Risks for ...

    www.pharmacompliancemonitor.com/...criminal-liability...for.../2141/

    Apr 23, 2012 - Pharmaceutical Criminal Liability: Continuing Risks for Executives and ...in a case involving the off-label promotion of Stryker's Biotech medical  ...

    Stryker pleads guilty to selling unapproved devices, to pay ...

    www.reuters.com/.../us-health-stryker-idUSKBN0JM24K201412...

    Reuters
    Dec 8, 2014 - Medical device maker Stryker Corp will pay the U.S. government $80 million to settle criminal and civil charges that its OtisMed Corp subsidiary ...

This is why I need I need my readers to send this out to everyone you know including and especially members of Congress... Please. I will give you more details later.

This is the mirror article:
http://www.qmed.com/mpmn/medtechpulse/stryker-accused-hiding-metal-metal-spine-implant-problems

Monday, January 18, 2016

Bring Back the Guillotine


It kept the rich in line in France.




Until the corporate gangsters of the world are gone humanity will continue to suffer. It worked for the French and it will work here. Terrorism is a tool for forcing change and it worked in France. Since the rich have neither morals or conscience fear and money is all that motivates them.


Saturday, January 16, 2016

To the Birthers and Ted Cruz

Just STFU and watch the video!   

OMay 14, Alberta-born Sen. Ted Cruz renounced his Canadian dual citizenship. The renunciation became official roughly 9 months after he feigned not knowing he wasn’t only an American. Cruz has known all along that he is not eligible to run for president and the only reason he's running is to pocket campaign money.




Friday, January 15, 2016

Republicans and Immigration: Their Hypocrisy Exposed!

The only Republican who really wants to crackdown on illegal immigration is Donald Trump and the biggest critics of Trump's proposals on stopping illegal immigration are his fellow Republicans. Their hypocrisy is mind boggling. Out of one side of their lying gutter mouths they criticizes Obama on immigration in spite of the fact that there were more deportations in Obama's first year than there were in 8 years of criminal George W Bush. Trump comes out with a tough plan to stop the flow of illegal immigration and the Republican, filthy lying cock suckers that they are, attack Trump as viciously and as dishonestly as they attack Obama.

Republicans want illegals here because illegal workers can be paid under the table. Republicans especially want Cubans here in spite of the fact that Cubans are far more likely to be lazy freeloading criminals unlike Mexicans who are hard working moral people. Why is this you ask. Republicans are criminal by nature but that is not why they want hordes of Cubans stinking up South Florida and the rest of America. The answer is quite simple. Cuban's being criminal by nature, vote Republican.

According to Congressional sources, it is possible a vote on free travel could occur as part of one of these appropriations bills. Senators Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Patrick Leahy's (D-Vt.) bill to lift travel restrictions currently has a healthy 44 cosponsors. Leahy is also the ranking democrat on the Senate’s State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs subcommittee. Companion legislation led by Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) in the House has 35 cosponsors.
While bipartisan support for normalization is growing, especially among farm state members, two Senators, Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) have vowed to block funding for the embassy and confirmation of an ambassador. Both are of Cuban origin but were born in the U.S. and have never been to the island. 
The Cuban Adjustment Act (CAA), Public Law 89-732, is a United States federal law enacted on November 2, 1966. Passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson, the law applies to any native or citizen of Cuba who has been inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States after January 1, 1959 and has been physically present for at least one year; and is admissible to the United States as a permanent resident.

The hilarious video at the end of this report explains it well.



Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Ted Cruz NOT a Natural Born Citizen



Ted Cruz is disqualified to be president and not just because he's a flaming asshole and a traitor or because Trump says so. Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen.

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The Twelfth Amendment states, "No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." The Fourteenth Amendment does not use the phrase natural-born citizen. It does provide, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Under Article One of the United States Constitution, representatives and senators are required to be U.S. citizens, but there is no requirement that they be natural born.

Apple's Double Irish Scam

The double Irish arrangement is a tax avoidance strategy that some multinational corporations use to lower their corporate tax liability. The strategy uses payments between related entities in a corporate structure to shift income from a higher-tax country to a lower-tax country. It relies on the fact that Irish tax law does not include US transfer pricingrules.[1] Specifically, Ireland has territorial taxation, and hence does not levy taxes on income booked in subsidiaries of Irish companies that are outside the state.
The double Irish tax structure was pioneered in the late 1980s by companies such as Apple Inc..[2] In 2010 a law intended to counter such arrangements was passed,[where?]though existing arrangements were exempt and lawyers have said that this change will cause no significant problems for multinational firms.[3]
In 2013, the Irish government announced that companies which incorporate in Ireland must also be tax resident there. This counter-measure took effect in January 2015, for newly incorporated companies, and will take effect in 2020 for companies with existing operations in Ireland.[4] Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan, during the presentation of his 2015 budget, said that he believed this would align Ireland's corporate tax regime with international best practice.[5]

Dutch sandwich[edit]
Example of a double Irish with a Dutch sandwich:
1. An advertiser pays for an ad in Germany.
2. The ad agency sends money to its subsidiary in Ireland, which holds the intellectual property (IP).
3. Tax payable in Ireland is 12.5 percent, but the Irish company pays a royalty to a Dutch subsidiary, for which it gets an Irish tax deduction.
4. The Dutch company pays the money to yet another subsidiary in Ireland, with no withholding tax on inter-EU transactions.
5. The last subsidiary, although it is in Ireland, pays no tax because it is controlled outside Ireland, in Bermuda or another tax haven.
Ireland does not levy withholding tax on certain receipts from European Union member States. Revenues from sales of the products shipped by the second Irish company (the second in the double Irish) are first booked by a shell company in theNetherlands, taking advantage of generous tax laws there. Overcoming[clarification needed] the Irish tax system, the remaining profits are transferred directly to Cayman Islands or Bermuda. This part of the scheme is referred to as the "Dutch sandwich".[7][8] The Irish authorities never see the full revenues and hence cannot tax them, even at the low Irish corporate tax rates.





Apple Faces Pollution Charges — Again · Environmental ...




Ten Reasons Why Fat Women Suck.



1. They look like hell. Fat women are an eyesore the look even more repulsive naked.

Image result for angry fat woman meme
2. They are unhealthy. Most have some sort of chronic illness along with their fattitude.


3. They have an offensive odor.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/12/FatGirlCantPlay.jpg
4. They are jealous of slender women.

Image result for obesity birth defects
5. They make horrible mothers. e.g. Toxic wombs, high risk pregnancies and bad role models

http://img.webmd.com/dtmcms/live/webmd/consumer_assets/site_images/articles/health_tools/moderate_to_severe_psoriais_slideshow/dermnet_rm_photo_of_inversus_psoriasis.jpg

6. They are far more likely to have an STD.


7. They have lower IQ's than slender women.


Image result for angry fat woman meme
8. They are estrogen dominant and that makes them extra crazy.


9. They have bad attitudes.

Image result for Nasty fat woman
10. They are extremely selfish and delusional.

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

A Message From Alan Grayson


The following press release was sent to me, Fat Bastardo by Congressman Alan Grayson of gun violence ridden Florida which is one of the most dangerous states thanks to Republicans allowing in criminal Cubans and electing criminals for governor such as criminal Jeb Bush and criminal Slick Rick Scott.
Dear Fat Bastardo,

I support the President’s executive action to close the gun show loophole. And, frankly, I don’t understand why Congressional Republicans are complaining about it. To me, their arguments seem like nonsense.

When you buy a gun in a gun shop, you go through a background check. If it turns out that you are prohibited from owning a gun – for instance, a convicted felon – then you don’t get it.

But if you buy a gun at a “gun show” or online, even from a gun dealer, then there is no background check. Therefore, one can buy it even if one is a felon, a fugitive, a drug addict, undocumented, dishonorably discharged, committed to a mental institution, etc.

Excuse me, but why would we, The American People, want to establish a system of “universal” background checks for would-be gun owners, and then exclude gun dealers selling at gun shows (or online) from that universe? Why? What’s the point? I just don’t get it.

Here is an interesting poll from two weeks ago. Question: “Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?”

Democrats: 95% yes, 5% no. Republicans: 87% yes, 12% no.
The same poll, last summer, found that 92% of all gun owners support universal background checks at gun shows and online.
Jus’ plain folks understand this. Why don’t the Republicans in Congress?

So the President has taken executive action to extend the background check requirement to everyone who is in the business of selling guns, even if the transaction takes place at a gun show or over the internet. Here are the consequences:

Good: it will be much more difficult for felons, drug addicts and the criminally insane to buy weapons that can kill.

Bad: ???

Enough with the ideology, already. Seriously. If we’re going to have laws, then they should be practical laws that actually work.

B-b-b-but what about the “slippery slope”?? Ah, yes, the slippery slope. Yes, I confess, preventing felons from buying guns sends us hurtling – no, careening – down that slippery slope, toward . . . .

Personal safety.

Courage,
Rep. Alan Grayson