TSA Body Scanner Images

Fat admirers will be sorely disappointed to find that you won't find any of BBWs and SSBBWs from leaked images from TSA scanners. For some reason when the TSA selects a person to send through a scanner they only pick a thinling and 90% of the time that thinling is either a woman or a child. I will not be showing any of leaked images of children because it is immoral and it is also against the law. If any of our readers have any pictures of fat men of fat women from TSA scanners please post link in the comments box.

After an exhaustive Internet search I could find no BBW TSA scanner images.

There are two possible explanations or why we don't see any fat people on TSA scanner images. The first explanation is it there are no fat admirers working for the TSA. TSA agents are just regular perverts who likes look at normal sized women naked. The other explanation is much more ominous. Perhaps these dangerous radiation emitting scanners are unable to penetrate blubber and fat folds of BBW's so the TSA did not even bother to scan fat and obese people.



>





 

>



>
>


















Ok you TSA Nazis let's see you body scan these hot and sexy BBWs.

Justin Bieber Drives 100 MPH and Spits in Neighbor's Face

A face we'd all love to punch!

Let's not mince words here, Justin Bieber is a total fucking asshole. The question now is how would you like to see this privileged little cocksucker punished?

From TMZ

The man -- a 47-year-old successful businessman and father of 3 -- went onto Justin's Calabasas property and screamed, "You can't drive like this!"  The man told deputies, Justin responded by saying , "Get the f**k out of here," and then he spit in the guy's face and said, "I'm gonna f**king kill you."

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/03/27/justin-bieber-spit-threatened-to-kill-calabasas-neighbor/#ixzz2OmmF5SIQ
Visit the TMZ Store: http://tmzstore.com

We all know that Bieber will get the star treatment and a slap on the wrist so if you could sentence him what would you want his punishment to be? I have some suggestions.


1. Crush one of his nuts with a mallet.


2. Put him on Bully Beatdown and have a girl beat the crap out of him.


3. Hit him in the face with a brick so he will STFU.


4. Karate chop him in the throat. (It will improve his singing.)


5. Waterboard the little bitch!


6. Throw him in a mosh pit.


7. Have the Rock lay the smackdown on his candy ass.



8. Have a fat girl or two sit on his face and make him eat his way out.


9. Put him in a room with a snarling dog.

10. I'll leave the 10th one up to our reader's fertile imaginations.


This is once again an example of thin privilege and White privilege. Had this been a fat guy like Ruben the stud Studdard, a guy who really can sing, the cops would be tazering the shit out out of him, pepper spraying him and beat the crap out of him.

On a happy side note...



Ruben Studdard has a hot and skinny wife. This truly is the natural order of things! Skinny women should only be with fat guys!

UPDATE!  BOMBSHELL!

Justin Bieber will be prosecuted! CLICK HERE!

Rumor has it Justin Bieber is set to be prosecuted for spitting on his neighbor.

According to TMZ, the 19-year-old singer will likely be facing criminal charges after allegedly spitting on and threatening his neighbor, who recently complained about Bieber's reckless driving. The Calabasas, Calif., resident and father-of-three is unhappy with the way Bieber and his friends, including Lil Twist, drive around their gated community.

Reportedly, Bieber took out his Ferrari at 8 A.M. for a 100mph spin through the neighborhood on March 26, which upset the man. When he went over to Bieber's property and yelled, "You can't drive like this!" in the morning, the "As Long As You Love Me" singer responded with, "Get the f--k out of here. I'm gonna f--king kill you," and then spit in his face. The neighbor, a successful businessman, filed a battery report and is not backing down.

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ that investigators will refer the case to the L.A. County District Attorney for review after the investigation is completed, and the department will recommend that criminal battery charges be filed against Bieber.

Heart Attack Grill Diet Plan

Are you sure this will work nurse?

A program that you can stick to! We understand that nothing can be more depressing than failing to follow through with a new diet. That's why we prescribe great tasting high calorie meals including the Double Bypass Burger, Flatliner Fries, Full Sugar Coke, Butterfat Shake, and no-filter cigarettes! University studies have proven that diets which include these types of food are much more likely to become a life-long habit.

No more Yo-Yo effect! Doctors agree that continually cycling body weight up and down is one of the very worst things a person can do to themselves. That's why our program is focused upon keeping your weight in an extremely stable, gradual, and constant upward slope.

Affordable! While other diet centers continue to charge exorbitant fees, the Heart Attack Grill program is focused upon remaining affordable. Always keeping the patient's budget in mind, you'll have the comfort of knowing that all your meals are absolutely free once you achieve the 350 pound goal weight. Imagine the joy of knowing you've finally achieved something.

A program that you can stick to! We understand that nothing can be more depressing than failing to follow through with a new diet. That's why we prescribe great tasting high calorie meals including the Double Bypass Burger, Flatliner Fries, Full Sugar Coke, Butterfat Shake, and no-filter cigarettes! University studies have proven that diets which include these types of food are much more likely to become a life-long habit.

DISCLAIMER: Government agencies and various politically-correct busy bodies insist that we state: “The American Medical Association has denied Dr. Jon the right to continue practicing medicine in the United States. His nurses are not certified by the state of Nevada.”

"Wow, I've gained 20 pounds in just two months. The Heart Attack Grill Diet really works!"

CORAL SPRINGS COPS Beat, Strip Search and Terrorize BBW Widow

Susan Mait Victim Of Police Brutality

BBW WIDOW TERRORIZED, BEATEN and STRIP SEARCHED BY CORRUPT CORAL SPRINGS COPS

It used to be that cops just brutalized blacks and teenage boys. It then graduated to black women and white adult males. Most of the time they left fat people alone because very often we carry doughnuts. Now the cops are attacking not only fat men but fat women in order to get their jollies.

It seems now that when we look at police brutality videos on YouTube we are seeing less blacks being beaten and now more whites. Blacks have something they call Nigger Radar.  Maybe that's why they are avoiding some of the police brutality and maybe now cops are shifting their sick sexual perversion of beating people onto anyone they can find.

It can also be the blacks have become experts in dealing with brutal cops. That being said, I have no doubt that blacks are still being beaten by cops and the disproportionate rate than whites but this is to warn whites. Your skin color will along to protect you from brutal cops. This is also a warning to fat people. Just because you're fat it does not mean the cops will not avoid laying the boots, pepper spray, nightsticks and tasers to you.

This incident happened in Coral Springs Florida. It seems that the Coral Springs Police Department as a big problem with police corruption and police brutality. That being the case I am warning all people and especially fat people to avoid taking a vacation in coral Springs Florida.

To read more about the brutality and sexual assault Susan Mait sufferered at the hands of the corrupt Coral Springs police click here.

Thug Officers Derek Fernandes and Nicole "the Slut" Stasnek

Two Coral Springs Police officers are currently under investigation after allegedly falsifying reports in a DUI arrest of a woman in October, according to CSPD spokesperson Lt. Joe McHugh and the Broward State Attorney's Office.

On October 4, Susan Mait, 60, ran her Lexus into the curb on Royal Palm Boulevard and developed two flat tires, the Sun Sentinel reports. Officers Derek Fernandes and Nicole Stasnek responded to the scene, ultimately charging Mait with driving under the influence and resisting arrest.

Mait, whose husband was killed by a driver under the influence of drugs, according to the Sentinel, spent the night in jail.

But the Broward State Attorney dropped charges against Mait this week after urine samples revealed she only had an anti-depressant in her system, the Associated Press reports, and after an audio recording was released that confirmed false statements on the officers' depositions.

Americans Fed up with Drug Industry Influence and FDA Corruption

By Mike Adams, Natural News Editor

More than four out of five Americans think drug companies have too much influence over the Food and Drug Administration, and 84 percent believe that advertisements for prescription drugs with safety concerns should be outlawed, reveals a striking new survey from Consumer Reports.

The survey results, released today, are based on a telephone survey of 1,026 American adults conducted by the Consumer Reports National Research Center. They reveal the Food and Drug Administration to be alarmingly out of touch with the concerns of the American people. Some of the most interesting results include:

• 96 percent agreed the government should have the power to require warning labels on drugs with known safety problems. As Consumer Reports explains, "Right now, the Food and Drug Administration must negotiate safety warning labels with a drug maker."

• 84 percent agree that drug companies have "too much influence over the government officials who regulate them." More than two-thirds of those surveyed are concerned that drug companies actually pay the FDA to review and approve their drugs. It's a situation that turns drug companies into the "customers" of the FDA. (See related cartoon, The Puppets of Big Pharma)

• 92 percent agree that pharmaceutical companies should disclose the results of ALL clinical trials, not just the ones with positive results that they wish to publicize. (Currently, drug companies can bury negative drug trials, and the FDA has in fact been caught conspiring with drug companies to keep negative drug data secret from the public.)

• 93 percent think that the FDA should have the power to demand follow-up safety studies from drug companies. Currently, the FDA has no authority to require follow-up safety studies on drugs after they are introdued to the market. This is a serious oversight shortfall, given that many problems with drugs only appear after widespread use. (Patients are widely used as guinea pigs in any new drug launch.)

FDA Conflicts of Interest. Click to view full cartoon.

• 60 percent agreed that doctors and scientists with a financial conflict of interest should not be allowed to serve on FDA advisory boards (what were the other 40 percent thinking?). Currently, doctors who earn hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in "consulting fees" from drug companies are not only allowed to vote on the recommendations for FDA approval of their drugs, there is not even any FDA requirement to disclose such conflicts of interest. (See related cartoon on FDA Conflicts of Interest)

New rules proposed by the FDA would reduce this level of corruption by allowing doctors to receive a maximum of $50,000 per year from companies impacted by their decisions. (Thereby making the FDA numerically less corrupt than it is now, but still tolerating blatant conflicts of interest. It's like setting a "bribery ceiling.")

• 91 percent said they had seen a drug advertisement on television or in print (a "victory" accomplished by the FDA legalizing such ads in 1998), and 26 percent said they asked their doctor for a brand-name medication after learning about it from an advertisement. This is the purpose of advertising, of course: To increase sales of drugs, not -- as is claimed by Big Pharma and the FDA -- to "educate" patients about medical treatments.

• 75 percent agreed that the allowing of drug advertising has resulted in the over-prescribing of pharmaceuticals. Fifty-nine percent said the government should restrict pharmaceutical advertising, and 26 percent said they "strongly agree" with such restrictions.

Direct-to-consumer advertising is the bread and butter of Big Pharma, and it is the primary reason the industry has exploded its revenues and influence since 1998. The invention and marketing of fictitious diseases via television advertising has proven instrumental to the drug industry's successful pushing of medically unjustified drugs onto consumers. (See the Disease Mongering Engine to invent your own fictitious diseases and disorders right now!)

• The survey further revealed 54 percent of consumers think that viewing drug advertisements allows them to "take charge of their health care." The survey did not, however, reveal whether these people were in fact suffering from deterimental cognitive side effects at the moment they were taking the survey. Statistically, it seems reasonable to assume that approximately half of the adults taking the survey were on drugs at the time they were answering the survey questions.

When Pharmacists Tell the Truth. Click to view full cartoon.

• More than half of those surveyed said they are currently taking prescription drugs, indicating that more than half of American adults are now on drugs. Forty percent said they have experienced a negative reaction (side effect) from taking prescription medications. (See related cartoon on side effects.)

Most side effects go unreported, and there is currently no enforced legal requirement that doctors or drug companies report known side effects to the FDA. According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, prescription drugs currently kill approximately 100,000 Americans each year. None of those deaths are accurately recorded as "death by pharmaceuticals."

• As mentioned earlier, 84 percent agree that advertisements should be outlawed for drugs with safety concerns. The United States is the only advanced nation in the world that allows drug companies to advertise directly to consumers. It was legalized in 1998 by the FDA, following political pressure and influence from the drug companies who knew that being able to promote fictitious diseases and push brand-name drugs would result in windfall profits. (Some drugs are sold at markups as high as 300,000% over the cost of their ingredients.)

The makers of Vioxx and Paxil had studies that indicated safety problems for years, but did not release those results to the public. - Consumer Reports The real threat of pharmaceuticals
Interestingly, the survey did not ask consumers the following question: How many Americans do you think is acceptable for the drug companies to kill each year?

Because right now, that number is, conservatively, about 100,000 American citizens. More realistic estimates put it at double that number, or 200,000. I've often stated that pharmaceuticals kill more Americans each year than diet in the entire Vietnam War, and the number of Americans killed by acts of terrorism are dwarfed by the number killed by prescription drugs that the FDA and drug companies unquestionably knew were killing people. It's not that these deaths were truly accidental... they were fully documented but ignored anyway by an industry that is now clearly a very real threat to the health and safety of the American people.

This is no exaggeration: The number of people killed by FDA-approved pharmaceuticals since 9/11 is equivalent to dropping a nuclear bomb on a major U.S. city. International terrorists could not even hope to cause the number of casualties in the United States that have been achieved by the drug companies working in conspiracy with the FDA.

If we don't put limits on the influence and corruption of the drug companies by banning drug ads and demanding serious FDA reforms, the body count will only get worse. Consumers are finally waking up to this reality, and they're increasingly demanding "get tough" solutions that would require the FDA to protect the people instead of protecting Big Pharma profits.

As Bill Baughan, a senior policy analyst with Consumers Union (Consumer Reports), said, "Consumers expect Congress to take their concerns about drug safety seriously, and deliver legislation that will prevent future Vioxx-type disasters. Failure to act this year on the strongest possible bill, when more than 80 pecent of Americans agree that Congress should do whatever is necessary to ensure drug safety, would equate to gross legislative malpractice." Most Americans agree with NaturalNews
What's really interesting about these results is that they show most Americans agree with NaturalNews on issues like drug advertising, ending conflicts of interest at the FDA, requiring all clinical trials to be published, and other similar topics covered in this survey.

Meanwhile, very few Americans agree with the FDA or the wishes of organizations like the American Medical Association and drug companies themselves -- most of which like things just fine the way they are.

Drug companies, of course, would love to maintain the status quo and continue conducting business as usual. But thanks to grassroots consumer advocacy campaigns such as StopDrugAds (www.StopDrugAds.org), and sites like this one, the real story about the dangers of pharmaceuticals are no longer being censored and kept from the public.

The word is out: Pharmaceuticals are now the 4th leading cause of death in America. The best way to protect Americans from these dangerous, deadly products is to enact sweeping reforms that end the medical racket currently being operated by the FDA / Big Pharma tag-team.

Unfortunately, many of the very lawmakers who will vote on this pending legislation are, much like FDA advisors, "on the take" from the very same pharmaeutical companies that stand to be impacted by their vote. And no lawmakers that I know of are abstaining from the vote due to conflicts of interest. The reality is that Big Pharma has bought Congress, and whatever vote that will soon emerge is a far cry from the real reforms we'd see if our national lawmakers weren't financially beholden to the drug companies for their own reelection campaigns.

Thus, if Congress actually manages to pass a law that would eliminate drug company influence over FDA decision makers, it would be a clear case of lawmakers under the influence of drug money passing laws to eliminate the influence of drug money for others, but not for themselves.

There should be a law against that, it seems.

The FDA Vision Test. Click to view full cartoon.

True facts about the FDA

The following are facts about the FDA I've documented in my new book, Natural Health Solutions and the Conspiracy to Keep You From Knowing About Them. As this book reveals, the FDA has:

	Worked to keep deadly drugs on the market as long as possible before reluctantly pulling them (usually only after being sued by groups like Public Citizen). The astonishing story of Rezulin, a diabetes drug, is a good example.
	Repeatedly banned and confiscated herbs and nutritional supplements that compete with prescription drugs. Ephedra, for example, was banned by the FDA based on a political agenda, not good science.
	Conducted armed raids on alternative medicine clinics, confiscating computers, threatening alternative health practitioners, and scaring away patients. (See Tyranny in the USA: The true history of FDA raids on healers, vitamin shops and supplement companies)
	Ordered the destruction of recipe books promoting stevia, a natural sweetener that competes with sales of aspartame (yes, the FDA actually ordered the books to be destroyed).
	Been caught red-handed accepting bribes.
	Voted to put deadly drugs right back on the market even after such drugs were recalled by their manufacturer.
	Openly opposed the banning of junk food advertising to children during World Health Organization meetings.
	Suppressed information about the harm caused by dangerous drugs in order to prevent the press and the public from learning the truth about them.
	Attempted to silence its own drug safety scientists to prevent them from going public with the truth about dangerous drugs.
	Censored scientific information about the benefits of natural foods like cherries by threatening cherry growers with legal action if they did not remove scientific information about cherries from their websites. (See FDA tyranny and the censorship of cherry health facts)
	Pursued and shut down companies selling genuine cancer cures that provably work better than any prescription drug (such as Lane Labs' MGN-3).
	Vigorously argued against making "optimal health" a goal of the Codex Alimentarius discussions, striking the phrase from the final report.
	Rigged its drug safety review panels with decision makers who have substantial financial ties to drug companies, even while refusing to disclose such blatant conflicts of interest.
	Planned, organized, and took part in armed "SWAT-style" raids on vitamin shops, pet food stores, and even a church.
	Knowingly approved harmful food additives for widespread use in the food supply (such as aspartame, which has a rather dubious history and has been proven toxic in several studies), even when its own safety experts recommended denying approval.
	Allowed the continued legal use of harmful, cancer-causing food additives in the national food supply such as sodium nitrite (which causes cancer and yet is intentionally added to nearly all processed meats).
	Refused to ban a poisonous artificial fat from the food supply (hydrogenated oils) for decades, even though the World Health Organization urged member nations to outlaw the substance in 1978. Hydrogenated oils continue to harm infants, children, and adults today.

It is clearly time to reform not merely the FDA, but the entire medical industry. Drug companies are running amok, and this new Consumer Reports survey reveals that consumers are finally fed up with it.