Cercivore Clincal Trial Crimes At Stryker Medical

 There is an attempt to keep this out of mainstream media.. Please get this article out everywhere you can post it.

When it comes to crime corporate crime outpaces street crime by a country mile and when it comes to corporate crime one generally thinks of the financial industry. While financial industry crime is rampant it pales in comparison to medical industry crime. If they were giving out Olympic medals for corporate crime the medical industry would win the gold, silver and bronze. Generally when one thinks about medical crime they think about, billing fraud and big pharma bribing the FDA. As serious as those crimes are we mustn't forget the medical device industry and perhaps the biggest gangster in the medical industry is Stryker Medical. Stryker has committed many criminal acts but one of their most egregious that cause the most grievous injuries was the illegal Cervicore clinical trial in which while colluding with the FDA Stryker knowingly implanted the the dangerous Cervicore into the cervical spines of 250 test subjects many of whom are dying slow and agonizing deaths from metal poisoning. Sadly for these victims, because  this is considered a experimental device no other surgeon has the courage to remove it for fear of reprisals from the goon squads or golden handcuffs at Stryker Medical.

I think what worries the gang at Stryker is not criminal fines or a lawsuit. Corporate gangsters buy their way out of prison all the time but in this case I suspect that the criminals at Stryker are worried about criminal prosecution because lawyers for the victims have strong evidence that Stryker and it clinical investigators were aware that the Cervicore disk implant had not received approval as an experimental device.

Stryker Medical's Long And Bloody History Of Criminal Misconduct

Otismed Corporation And Former CEO Plead Guilty To ...

www.justice.gov/.../otismed-corporati...





United States Department of Justice

Dec 8, 2014 - Corporation to Pay More than $80 Million to Resolve Criminal and Civil... criminal conduct, and was later acquired by Stryker Corp., a medical  ...

Stryker Gets Non Prosecution Agreement in FDA Criminal ...

www.corporatecrimereporter.com/.../stryker-gets-non-prosecution-agree...





Dec 8, 2014 - Stryker Gets Non Prosecution Agreement in FDA Criminal Case ...Stryker, OtisMed's parent corporation, cooperated with the government with  ...

Former head of Stryker Corp. subsidiary pleads guilty to fraud

www.northjersey.com/.../former-head-of-stryker-corp-subsid...





The Record

Dec 8, 2014 - The former head of a Stryker Corp. subsidiary pleaded guilty Monday to ... was bought by Stryker, the medical device maker, in 2009, after the fraudulent ...Stryker's OtisMed unit agreed to pay $80 million in criminal and civil  ...

Bigger Fatter Politics: Stryker Medical Crimes

biggerfatterpolitics.blogspot.com/2015/08/stryker-medical-crimes.html





Aug 20, 2015 - Stryker Spine Faces More Lawsuits. Stryker Corp. (NYSE:SYK) is fielding legal challenges on two fronts, one from a former distributor and ...

June 26, 2015: Former OtisMed CEO Sentenced for Selling ...

www.fda.gov/.../CriminalInvestigations/uc...





Food and Drug Administration

Jun 26, 2015 - The former president and CEO of OtisMed Corporation was ... Strykeracquired the company after the criminal conduct for which he was  ...

Former CEO of Stryker subsidiary sentenced to two years in ...

www.modernhealthcare.com › ... › Medical Devices





Modern Healthcare

Jun 26, 2015 - A former CEO of a Stryker Corp. subsidiary was sentenced to two years in ... and that OtisMed's criminal conduct happened before Stryker acquired it and without Stryker's knowledge. ... Tags: Medical Devices, Technology  ...

Stryker faces major fines over a subsidiary's past ...

www.modernhealthcare.com › ... › Medical Devices





Modern Healthcare

Dec 8, 2014 - Stryker Corp. is facing stiff penalties, including $80 million in fines and ...that OtisMed's criminal conduct 'occurred prior to Stryker's acquisition of ... led to believe by the FDA that the devices were Class 1 medical devices that  ...

Stryker Biotech spars with prosecutors over criminal charges ...

medcitynews.com/.../stryker-biotech-spars-with-prosecutors-over-crimin...





Nov 12, 2010 - The indictment also charges that Stryker and Philip lied to the FDA about the ... the government agency that regulated Stryker Biotech's medical ...

Pharmaceutical Criminal Liability: Continuing Risks for ...

www.pharmacompliancemonitor.com/...criminal-liability...for.../2141/





Apr 23, 2012 - Pharmaceutical Criminal Liability: Continuing Risks for Executives and ...in a case involving the off-label promotion of Stryker's Biotech medical  ...

Stryker pleads guilty to selling unapproved devices, to pay ...

www.reuters.com/.../us-health-stryker-idUSKBN0JM24K201412...





Reuters

Dec 8, 2014 - Medical device maker Stryker Corp will pay the U.S. government $80 million to settle criminal and civil charges that its OtisMed Corp subsidiary ...

This is why I need I need my readers to send this out to everyone you know including and especially members of Congress... Please. I will give you more details later.

This is the mirror article:
http://www.qmed.com/mpmn/medtechpulse/stryker-accused-hiding-metal-metal-spine-implant-problems

Bring Back the Guillotine

It kept the rich in line in France.

Until the corporate gangsters of the world are gone humanity will continue to suffer. It worked for the French and it will work here. Terrorism is a tool for forcing change and it worked in France. Since the rich have neither morals or conscience fear and money is all that motivates them.

To the Birthers and Ted Cruz

Just STFU and watch the video!   

On May 14, Alberta-born Sen. Ted Cruz renounced his Canadian dual citizenship. The renunciation became official roughly 9 months after he feigned not knowing he wasn’t only an American. Cruz has known all along that he is not eligible to run for president and the only reason he's running is to pocket campaign money.

Republicans and Immigration: Their Hypocrisy Exposed!

The only Republican who really wants to crackdown on illegal immigration is Donald Trump and the biggest critics of Trump's proposals on stopping illegal immigration are his fellow Republicans. Their hypocrisy is mind boggling. Out of one side of their lying gutter mouths they criticizes Obama on immigration in spite of the fact that there were more deportations in Obama's first year than there were in 8 years of criminal George W Bush. Trump comes out with a tough plan to stop the flow of illegal immigration and the Republican, filthy lying cock suckers that they are, attack Trump as viciously and as dishonestly as they attack Obama.

Republicans want illegals here because illegal workers can be paid under the table. Republicans especially want Cubans here in spite of the fact that Cubans are far more likely to be lazy freeloading criminals unlike Mexicans who are hard working moral people. Why is this you ask. Republicans are criminal by nature but that is not why they want hordes of Cubans stinking up South Florida and the rest of America. The answer is quite simple. Cuban's being criminal by nature, vote Republican.

According to Congressional sources, it is possible a vote on free travel could occur as part of one of these appropriations bills. Senators Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Patrick Leahy's (D-Vt.) bill to lift travel restrictions currently has a healthy 44 cosponsors. Leahy is also the ranking democrat on the Senate’s State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs subcommittee. Companion legislation led by Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) in the House has 35 cosponsors.

While bipartisan support for normalization is growing, especially among farm state members, two Senators, Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) have vowed to block funding for the embassy and confirmation of an ambassador. Both are of Cuban origin but were born in the U.S. and have never been to the island. 

The Cuban Adjustment Act (CAA), Public Law 89-732, is a United States federal law enacted on November 2, 1966. Passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson, the law applies to any native or citizen of Cuba who has been inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States after January 1, 1959 and has been physically present for at least one year; and is admissible to the United States as a permanent resident.

The hilarious video at the end of this report explains it well.

Ted Cruz NOT a Natural Born Citizen

Ted Cruz is disqualified to be president and not just because he's a flaming asshole and a traitor or because Trump says so. Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen.

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The Twelfth Amendment states, "No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." The Fourteenth Amendment does not use the phrase natural-born citizen. It does provide, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Under Article One of the United States Constitution, representatives and senators are required to be U.S. citizens, but there is no requirement that they be natural born.

Apple's Double Irish Scam

The double Irish arrangement is a tax avoidance strategy that some multinational corporations use to lower their corporate tax liability. The strategy uses payments between related entities in a corporate structure to shift income from a higher-tax country to a lower-tax country. It relies on the fact that Irish tax law does not include US transfer pricingrules.^[1] Specifically, Ireland has territorial taxation, and hence does not levy taxes on income booked in subsidiaries of Irish companies that are outside the state.

The double Irish tax structure was pioneered in the late 1980s by companies such as Apple Inc..^[2] In 2010 a law intended to counter such arrangements was passed,^[where?]though existing arrangements were exempt and lawyers have said that this change will cause no significant problems for multinational firms.^[3]

In 2013, the Irish government announced that companies which incorporate in Ireland must also be tax resident there. This counter-measure took effect in January 2015, for newly incorporated companies, and will take effect in 2020 for companies with existing operations in Ireland.^[4] Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan, during the presentation of his 2015 budget, said that he believed this would align Ireland's corporate tax regime with international best practice.^[5]

Dutch sandwich[edit]

Example of a double Irish with a Dutch sandwich:
1. An advertiser pays for an ad in Germany.
2. The ad agency sends money to its subsidiary in Ireland, which holds the intellectual property (IP).
3. Tax payable in Ireland is 12.5 percent, but the Irish company pays a royalty to a Dutch subsidiary, for which it gets an Irish tax deduction.
4. The Dutch company pays the money to yet another subsidiary in Ireland, with no withholding tax on inter-EU transactions.
5. The last subsidiary, although it is in Ireland, pays no tax because it is controlled outside Ireland, in Bermuda or another tax haven.

Ireland does not levy withholding tax on certain receipts from European Union member States. Revenues from sales of the products shipped by the second Irish company (the second in the double Irish) are first booked by a shell company in theNetherlands, taking advantage of generous tax laws there. Overcoming^{[clarification needed]} the Irish tax system, the remaining profits are transferred directly to Cayman Islands or Bermuda. This part of the scheme is referred to as the "Dutch sandwich".^[7][8] The Irish authorities never see the full revenues and hence cannot tax them, even at the low Irish corporate tax rates.

Apple Faces Pollution Charges — Again · Environmental ...

Apple Cited as Adding to Pollution in China - The New York ...

Apple factories accused of exploiting Chinese workers - The ...

Apple factory workers routinely abused, exploited by ...

Ten Reasons Why Fat Women Suck.

1. They look like hell. Fat women are an eyesore the look even more repulsive naked.


2. They are unhealthy. Most have some sort of chronic illness along with their fattitude.


3. They have an offensive odor.


4. They are jealous of slender women.


5. They make horrible mothers. e.g. Toxic wombs, high risk pregnancies and bad role models



6. They are far more likely to have an STD.


7. They have lower IQ's than slender women.



8. They are estrogen dominant and that makes them extra crazy.


9. They have bad attitudes.


10. They are extremely selfish and delusional.

Who Created ISIS? Putin's Theory

A Message From Alan Grayson

BushToll | Documenting the Bush Legacy of Failure The following press release was sent to me, Fat Bastardo by Congressman Alan Grayson of gun violence ridden Florida which is one of the most dangerous states thanks to Republicans allowing in criminal Cubans and electing criminals for governor such as criminal Jeb Bush and criminal Slick Rick Scott. Dear Fat Bastardo, I support the President’s executive action to close the gun show loophole. And, frankly, I don’t understand why Congressional Republicans are complaining about it. To me, their arguments seem like nonsense. When you buy a gun in a gun shop, you go through a background check. If it turns out that you are prohibited from owning a gun – for instance, a convicted felon – then you don’t get it. But if you buy a gun at a “gun show” or online, even from a gun dealer, then there is no background check. Therefore, one can buy it even if one is a felon, a fugitive, a drug addict, undocumented, dishonorably discharged, committed to a mental institution, etc. Excuse me, but why would we, The American People, want to establish a system of “universal” background checks for would-be gun owners, and then exclude gun dealers selling at gun shows (or online) from that universe? Why? What’s the point? I just don’t get it. Join me in supporting President Obama’s executive action to fight  against gun violence by adding your name now >> Here is an interesting poll from two weeks ago. Question: “Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?” Democrats: 95% yes, 5% no. Republicans: 87% yes, 12% no. The same poll, last summer, found that 92% of all gun owners support universal background checks at gun shows and online. Jus’ plain folks understand this. Why don’t the Republicans in Congress? Stand with me and President Obama to fight against gun violence, by adding your name >> So the President has taken executive action to extend the background check requirement to everyone who is in the business of selling guns, even if the transaction takes place at a gun show or over the internet. Here are the consequences: Good: it will be much more difficult for felons, drug addicts and the criminally insane to buy weapons that can kill. Bad: ??? Enough with the ideology, already. Seriously. If we’re going to have laws, then they should be practical laws that actually work. B-b-b-but what about the “slippery slope”?? Ah, yes, the slippery slope. Yes, I confess, preventing felons from buying guns sends us hurtling – no, careening – down that slippery slope, toward . . . . Personal safety. Courage, Rep. Alan Grayson

Think Vaccines Are Safe? Check Out Prevnar 13

Pfizer and Wyeth Fined for Bribery CLICK HERE

The medical industry will tell your that vaccines are safe. The facts say otherwise. Right now the industry is hawking Prevnar 13 a vaccine that they claim prevents pneumonia. There own studies say it is 46% effective. Given the fraud in clinical trials it could be 0% effective. What they don't tell you is all the side effects.

The company that makes Prevnar 13 is Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and it's distributed by Pfizer Inc. In 2014 Pfizer was criminally fines $2.3 BILLION. Wyeth has also faced huge criminal fines. Wyeth and Pfizer are pretty much the same company. Like all other big Pharma giants they are criminals and totally untrustworthy. Don't trust Wyeth, Pfizer or any pharmaceutical corporation.

Feds Hit Pfizer with a $2.3 Billion Fine - Businessweek

Pfizer, Wyeth Pay $60 Million In Settlement - The FCPA Blog ...

Wyeth forced to pay half a billion dollar fine for illegal ...

Wyeth-Ayerst to Pay $30-Million Fine - latimes

Justice Department Fines Pfizer Unit Wyeth $490.9 Million ...

More Off-Labeling Fines: $55 Million Against Wyeth ...

For the Consumer

Applies to pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine: intramuscular suspension

As well as its needed effects, pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine (the active ingredient contained in Prevnar 13) may cause unwanted side effects that require medical attention.

If any of the following side effects occur while taking pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine, check with your doctor or nurse immediately:

More common

• Fever

Rare

• Chest pain
• chills
• coughing, wheezing, or shortness of breath
• difficult or labored breathing
• difficulty with swallowing
• fast heartbeat
• noisy breathing
• seizures
• skin itching, rash, or redness
• sneezing
• sore throat
• swelling of the face, throat, or tongue
• tightness in the chest

Incidence not known

• Bladder pain
• blistering, peeling, or loosening of the skin
• bloody or cloudy urine
• bluish lips or skin
• body aches or pain
• choking
• confusion
• decreased urine output
• diarrhea
• difficult, burning, or painful urination
• dilated neck veins
• ear congestion
• extreme fatigue
• fainting
• frequent urge to urinate
• general feeling of discomfort or illness
• headache
• hives
• irregular breathing
• irregular heartbeat
• itching
• joint or muscle pain
• large, hive-like swelling on the face, eyelids, lips, tongue, throat, hands, legs, feet, or sex organs
• lightheadedness
• loss of appetite
• loss of voice
• lower back or side pain
• muscle aches and pains
• nasal congestion
• nausea
• not breathing
• puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue
• rapid, shallow breathing
• red, irritated eyes
• runny nose
• shivering
• sore throat
• sores, ulcers, or white spots in the mouth or on the lips
• sweating
• swelling of the face, fingers, feet, or lower legs
• swollen, painful, or tender lymph glands in the neck, armpit, or groin
• trouble sleeping
• troubled breathing
• unusual tiredness or weakness
• vomiting
• weight gain

Some pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine side effects may not need any medical attention. As your body gets used to the medicine these side effects may disappear. Your health care professional may be able to help you prevent or reduce these side effects, but do check with them if any of the following side effects continue, or if you are concerned about them:

More common

• Decreased appetite
• decreased sleep
• irritability
• red streaks on the skin
• swelling, tenderness, or pain at the injection site

Rare

• Abdominal or stomach pain
• crying
• hives or welts
• weakness

Incidence not known

• Bleeding, blistering, burning, coldness, discoloration of the skin, feeling of pressure, hives, infection, inflammation, itching, lumps, numbness, rash, redness, scarring, soreness, stinging, tingling, ulceration, or warmth at the injection site
• burning, dry, or itching eyes
• eye discharge or excessive tearing
• pain
• stomach cramps
• tenderness

For Healthcare Professionals

Applies to pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine: intramuscular suspension

Hypersensitivity

Hypersensitivity side effects have included anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reaction including shock, face edema, dyspnea, and bronchospasm.^[Ref]

Local

Local side effects have included redness, swelling, and tenderness at the injection site, injection-site dermatitis, pruritus, and urticaria.^[Ref]

Dermatologic

Dermatologic side effects have included urticaria or urticaria-like rash, angioneurotic edema, and erythema multiforme.^[Ref]

Respiratory

Respiratory side effects have included apnea.^[Ref]

Nervous system

Nervous system side effects have included seizures (including febrile seizures).^[Ref]

General

General side effects have included fever, decreased appetite, increased sleep, decreased sleep, and irritability.^[Ref]

Gastrointestinal

Gastrointestinal side effects have included diarrhea and vomiting.^[Ref]

References

1. "Product Information. Prevnar 13 (pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine)." Wyeth Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA.

It is possible that some side effects of Prevnar 13 may not have been reported. These can be reported to the FDA here. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical advice.